Quinnipiac

19-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.3%Quinnipiac

76.7%UCF

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUCF -7.6

PROJECTED TOTAL155.9

MODEL MONEYLINEUCF -329

UCF

21-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 74

Projected Total155.9

Projected ScoreUCF 82

Team Comparison

QuinnipiacMetricUCF

51MMH Power Index57.1

106.8Offensive Efficiency113.3

102.1Defensive Efficiency110.0

4.7Net Efficiency3.3

-2.3Strength of Schedule6.6

2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.8

70.5Tempo71.2

48.9%Effective FG%53.0%

15.6%Turnover Rate16.0%

34.1%Offensive Rebound %34.3%

34.1%Free Throw Rate31.1%

3.4Average Margin2.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (102.1–110.0), net efficiency (4.7–3.3), recent form (2.2–-3.8), ball security (15.6–16.0).

UCF COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (57.1–51.0), offensive efficiency (113.3–106.8), strength of schedule (6.6–-2.3).

Final

Quinnipiac

91—102

UCF

UCF by 11 • 78.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

QuinnipiacTEAM STATUCF

25-56FG37-70

45.0%FG%53.0%

12-263PT8-19

46.0%3PT%42.0%

29-35FT20-27

83.0%FT%74.0%

29Rebounds43

6Offensive Rebounds14

13Assists18

11Turnovers10

6Steals3

8Blocks3

25Fouls21

Player Box Score

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaden Zimmerman	G	36	5-11	2-4	14-16	1	4	3	0	26
Samson Reilly	G	16	6-7	5-6	0-0	1	0	0	0	17
Amarri Monroe	F	26	5-15	2-8	2-2	7	1	0	4	14
Grant Randall	F	24	3-6	1-4	5-5	3	0	1	0	12
Keith McKnight	G	29	4-7	1-1	2-2	1	0	1	1	11
Asim Jones	G	18	2-5	1-1	0-0	2	2	1	0	5
Nate Guerengomba	G	14	0-1	0-1	4-6	3	1	0	0	4
Tai Turnage	G	23	0-4	0-1	2-2	4	5	0	0	2
Spence Wewe	F	14	0-0	0-0	0-2	2	0	0	3	0

UCF

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jeremy Foumena	C	18	8-11	0-0	2-4	7	0	0	0	18
Riley Kugel	G	25	6-13	3-6	1-2	1	2	1	0	16
Jordan Burks	F	21	4-6	1-3	4-5	3	0	1	0	13
John Bol	C	18	6-7	0-0	1-1	6	0	0	1	13
Chris Johnson	G	12	4-7	3-5	0-0	2	2	0	0	11
Jamichael Stillwell	F	18	2-7	0-0	5-6	7	0	0	0	9
Devan Cambridge	F	24	1-4	1-2	5-6	5	1	1	2	8
Kris Parker	G	10	2-3	0-0	2-3	3	0	0	0	6
Themus Fulks	G	34	2-7	0-0	0-0	3	13	0	0	4
Carmelo Pacheco	G	17	2-5	0-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
George Beale Jr.	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Elijah Hulsewe	C	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

78.2Possessions78.2

116.4Offensive Efficiency130.4

130.4Defensive Efficiency116.4

-14.1Net Efficiency14.1

55.4%Effective FG%58.6%

62.7%True Shooting %61.6%

14.2%Turnover Rate12.7%

62.5%Free Throw Rate38.6%

46.4%3-Point Rate27.1%

1.18Assist / Turnover1.80

Game Summary

UCF won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 78.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.