Mississippi Valley State

3-30

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.0%Mississippi Valley State

99.0%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -33.1

PROJECTED TOTAL153.6

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -9900

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 60

Projected Total153.6

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 93

Team Comparison

Mississippi Valley StateMetricTexas A&M

17.7MMH Power Index58

91.1Offensive Efficiency116.1

117.8Defensive Efficiency108.4

-26.7Net Efficiency7.7

-4.1Strength of Schedule4.8

-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

70.5Tempo69.1

45.8%Effective FG%53.5%

21.8%Turnover Rate14.8%

26.5%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

34.5%Free Throw Rate37.5%

-18.8Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY99.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–17.7), offensive efficiency (116.1–91.1), defensive efficiency (108.4–117.8), net efficiency (7.7–-26.7).

Final

Mississippi Valley State

84—120

Texas A&M

Texas A&M by 36 • 86.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Mississippi Valley StateTEAM STATTexas A&M

30-59FG31-62

51.0%FG%50.0%

10-223PT16-34

45.0%3PT%47.0%

14-19FT42-50

74.0%FT%84.0%

34Rebounds31

12Offensive Rebounds13

25Assists25

31Turnovers13

7Steals13

6Blocks3

29Fouls23

Player Box Score

Mississippi Valley State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael James	G	33	10-15	7-10	5-5	2	4	1	0	32
Samuel Murray	F	15	5-6	0-1	3-5	1	2	0	0	13
Lamont Sams	F	18	4-8	2-4	0-0	3	1	0	2	10
X'Zaevion Barnett	G	30	2-5	0-1	3-5	9	7	3	0	7
Delkedric Holmes	G	28	3-9	0-2	0-0	3	5	2	0	6
Patrick Punch	G	27	2-5	0-1	1-2	3	2	0	0	5
Daniel Mayfield	F	24	1-7	1-3	2-2	5	3	1	3	5
Tyrone Iroghama	G	8	2-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	4
Chance Sutton	F	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	1	2
Mussa Mzein	C	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mackenzie Mgbako	F	17	5-9	3-6	6-6	1	2	0	0	19
Rubén Dominguez	G	23	3-8	3-8	6-6	1	4	1	0	15
Zach Clemence	F	18	4-6	4-5	3-4	3	0	1	1	15
Jamie Vinson	F	15	5-8	0-1	2-4	6	1	0	2	12
Marcus Hill	G	23	2-6	0-2	7-7	3	3	3	0	11
Josh Holloway	G	18	2-6	1-1	5-6	1	4	1	0	10
Jacari Lane	G	21	3-6	1-3	2-2	1	5	3	0	9
Pop Isaacs	G	19	3-5	2-4	0-1	3	4	1	0	8
Ali Dibba	G	10	2-2	1-1	1-2	1	2	2	0	6
Jeremiah Green	G	10	1-1	1-1	2-2	0	0	1	0	5
Federiko Federiko	F	10	0-0	0-0	4-6	3	0	0	0	4
Noah Shelby	G	5	0-2	0-2	4-4	1	0	0	0	4
Chris McDermott	F	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Rashaun Agee	F	4	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

86.4Possessions86.4

97.2Offensive Efficiency138.9

138.9Defensive Efficiency97.2

-41.7Net Efficiency41.7

59.3%Effective FG%62.9%

61.7%True Shooting %70.0%

35.6%Turnover Rate15.2%

32.2%Free Throw Rate80.6%

37.3%3-Point Rate54.8%

0.81Assist / Turnover1.92

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 36 points. The game played at approximately 86.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.