Winthrop

23-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

15.3%Winthrop

84.7%Nebraska

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNebraska -11.1

PROJECTED TOTAL153.4

MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -554

Nebraska

28-7

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWinthrop 71

Projected Total153.4

Projected ScoreNebraska 82

Team Comparison

WinthropMetricNebraska

56.2MMH Power Index67

115.6Offensive Efficiency114.4

104.3Defensive Efficiency98.3

11.3Net Efficiency16.1

-3.6Strength of Schedule6.1

2.8Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

72.4Tempo67.3

51.2%Effective FG%55.6%

15.0%Turnover Rate14.4%

35.5%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

44.4%Free Throw Rate26.9%

8.2Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Nebraska HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–56.2), defensive efficiency (98.3–104.3), net efficiency (16.1–11.3), strength of schedule (6.1–-3.6).

Winthrop COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.6–114.4), offensive rebounding (35.5–26.3), free throw rate (44.4–26.9).

Final

Winthrop

73—80

Nebraska

Nebraska by 7 • 69.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WinthropTEAM STATNebraska

26-69FG29-69

38.0%FG%42.0%

13-423PT13-38

31.0%3PT%34.0%

8-13FT9-10

62.0%FT%90.0%

48Rebounds38

17Offensive Rebounds10

15Assists22

11Turnovers5

3Steals7

5Blocks5

15Fouls12

Player Box Score

Winthrop

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kareem Rozier	G	30	4-14	4-10	2-2	2	1	0	0	14
Daylen Berry	G	26	5-15	2-10	0-0	6	2	0	0	12
Pharrell Boyogueno	G	14	3-5	3-4	2-2	6	1	0	1	11
Tommy Kamarad	F	19	3-6	2-4	0-0	4	2	1	0	8
Logan Duncomb	C	16	4-7	0-0	0-0	10	2	1	1	8
Kody Clouet	G	24	1-6	1-6	2-2	3	0	0	0	5
Seifeldin Hendawy	G	21	2-6	1-5	0-0	4	3	0	0	5
Tai Hamilton	F	14	2-3	0-0	0-2	4	2	0	1	4
Ed Nnamoko	F	9	1-1	0-0	2-5	4	0	0	1	4
Isaiah Wilson	G	13	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	1	1	1	2
Josh Meo	G	14	0-4	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	0

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rienk Mast	F	33	11-18	7-10	2-2	5	4	1	1	31
Braden Frager	F	31	4-13	1-7	2-2	6	2	0	0	11
Cale Jacobsen	G	27	4-7	0-0	3-4	6	2	1	2	11
Pryce Sandfort	F	30	4-13	2-10	0-0	8	2	1	0	10
Jared Garcia	F	11	2-4	1-2	2-2	2	0	0	2	7
Jamarques Lawrence	G	26	2-6	1-3	0-0	1	4	0	0	5
Connor Essegian	G	11	1-6	1-5	0-0	2	2	0	0	3
Sam Hoiberg	G	31	1-2	0-1	0-0	6	6	4	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

69.0Possessions69.0

105.8Offensive Efficiency115.9

115.9Defensive Efficiency105.8

-10.1Net Efficiency10.1

47.1%Effective FG%51.4%

48.6%True Shooting %54.2%

15.9%Turnover Rate7.3%

18.8%Free Throw Rate14.5%

60.9%3-Point Rate55.1%

1.36Assist / Turnover4.40

Game Summary

Nebraska won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 69.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.