
UNLV
18-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
56.5%UNLV
43.5%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL154.1
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -130

Rutgers
13-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 78
Projected Total154.1
Projected ScoreRutgers 76
Team Comparison
52.8MMH Power Index45.9
111.0Offensive Efficiency104.2
109.6Defensive Efficiency112.2
1.4Net Efficiency-8.0
2.7Strength of Schedule3.9
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6
71.4Tempo67.4
53.7%Effective FG%47.4%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.0%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
41.6%Free Throw Rate36.3%
1.0Average Margin-5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–45.9), offensive efficiency (111.0–104.2), defensive efficiency (109.6–112.2), net efficiency (1.4–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.9–2.7), ball security (15.0–17.2).