UNLV logo

UNLV

18-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
56.5%UNLV
43.5%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL154.1
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -130
Rutgers logo

Rutgers

13-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 78
Projected Total154.1
Projected ScoreRutgers 76

Team Comparison

52.8MMH Power Index45.9
111.0Offensive Efficiency104.2
109.6Defensive Efficiency112.2
1.4Net Efficiency-8.0
2.7Strength of Schedule3.9
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6
71.4Tempo67.4
53.7%Effective FG%47.4%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.0%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
41.6%Free Throw Rate36.3%
1.0Average Margin-5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UNLV HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–45.9), offensive efficiency (111.0–104.2), defensive efficiency (109.6–112.2), net efficiency (1.4–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.9–2.7), ball security (15.0–17.2).
Final
UNLV logo
UNLV
65—80
Rutgers logo
Rutgers
Rutgers by 15 • 69.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UNLVTEAM STATRutgers
25-63FG24-57
40.0%FG%42.0%
5-223PT4-16
23.0%3PT%25.0%
10-16FT28-36
63.0%FT%78.0%
33Rebounds45
10Offensive Rebounds14
14Assists10
8Turnovers10
5Steals5
5Blocks4
24Fouls16

Player Box Score

UNLV
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tyrin JonesF316-110-01-542030013
Kimani HamiltonF304-71-14-570100013
Al GreenG225-111-52-221000013
Dra Gibbs-LawhornG355-140-50-035110010
Naas CunninghamF222-52-41-24010007
Issac WilliamsonG252-80-32-21320006
Walter BrownF201-21-20-02101003
Howie Fleming Jr.G150-50-20-04200000
Rutgers
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Emmanuel OgboleC297-120-07-11130020021
Dylan GrantF315-111-66-880100017
Darren Buchanan Jr.G215-92-33-441000015
Tariq FrancisG293-71-34-422200011
Jamichael DavisG322-40-02-34600006
Chris NwuliF181-50-14-44102006
Lino MarkG130-30-02-23010002
Bryce DortchF111-10-00-03000002
Denis BadalauF100-30-10-00010000
Harun ZrnoG60-20-20-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

69.4Possessions69.4
93.7Offensive Efficiency115.3
115.3Defensive Efficiency93.7
-21.6Net Efficiency21.6
43.7%Effective FG%45.6%
46.0%True Shooting %54.0%
11.7%Turnover Rate14.3%
25.4%Free Throw Rate63.2%
34.9%3-Point Rate28.1%
1.75Assist / Turnover1.00
Game Summary
Rutgers won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 69.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.