Miami (OH)

32-2

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

74.1%Miami (OH)

25.9%UNC Greensboro

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMiami (OH) -7.9

PROJECTED TOTAL167.1

MODEL MONEYLINEMiami (OH) -286

UNC Greensboro

15-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 88

Projected Total167.1

Projected ScoreUNC Greensboro 80

Team Comparison

Miami (OH)MetricUNC Greensboro

60.7MMH Power Index46.7

123.1Offensive Efficiency112.6

103.7Defensive Efficiency115.3

19.4Net Efficiency-2.7

-5.6Strength of Schedule-1.9

5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

72.8Tempo69.8

60.6%Effective FG%52.8%

14.2%Turnover Rate14.6%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %28.7%

40.1%Free Throw Rate41.7%

14.1Average Margin-1.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–46.7), offensive efficiency (123.1–112.6), defensive efficiency (103.7–115.3), net efficiency (19.4–-2.7).

UNC Greensboro COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.9–-5.6), offensive rebounding (28.7–26.3), free throw rate (41.7–40.1).

Final

Miami (OH)

82—71

UNC Greensboro

Miami (OH) by 11 • 72.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Miami (OH)TEAM STATUNC Greensboro

28-59FG23-54

47.0%FG%43.0%

11-343PT6-22

32.0%3PT%27.0%

15-20FT19-25

75.0%FT%76.0%

29Rebounds38

6Offensive Rebounds10

14Assists3

10Turnovers17

9Steals5

3Blocks—

18Fouls19

Player Box Score

Miami (OH)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Peter Suder	G	34	7-11	1-4	5-5	7	3	4	0	20
Almar Atlason	F	23	6-12	2-7	4-4	5	1	1	0	18
Brant Byers	G	24	3-6	3-6	2-4	3	1	0	1	11
Evan Ipsaro	G	33	3-4	1-2	2-2	3	4	1	0	9
Eian Elmer	G	34	3-8	2-5	0-0	6	0	2	1	8
Antwone Woolfolk	F	17	3-6	0-2	0-0	2	0	1	1	6
Tyler Robbins	F	7	2-3	2-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Luke Skaljac	G	21	0-5	0-4	2-4	1	4	0	0	2
Kyle Waltz	F	3	1-1	0-0	0-1	1	1	0	0	2
Trey Perry	G	4	0-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UNC Greensboro

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
KJ Younger	G	29	5-9	2-5	2-4	6	0	1	14
Justin Neely	F	30	3-10	0-1	7-9	11	1	1	13
Assane Mandian	G	21	3-6	2-4	3-3	5	0	0	11
Lilian Marville	G	31	3-8	1-2	2-2	3	1	0	9
Donald Whitehead Jr.	G	31	3-12	0-6	2-3	2	1	0	8
Noah Norgaard	G	21	2-3	0-1	3-4	4	0	0	7
Valentino Pinedo	F	16	2-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	2	4
Clinton Efinda	F	11	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	3
Domas Kauzonas	F	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

72.7Possessions72.7

112.8Offensive Efficiency97.7

97.7Defensive Efficiency112.8

15.1Net Efficiency-15.1

56.8%Effective FG%48.1%

59.9%True Shooting %53.9%

13.8%Turnover Rate23.3%

33.9%Free Throw Rate46.3%

57.6%3-Point Rate40.7%

1.40Assist / Turnover0.18

Game Summary

Miami (OH) won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 72.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.