
Army
11-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.7%Army
66.3%Fairleigh Dickinson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFairleigh Dickinson -5.4
PROJECTED TOTAL143.7
MODEL MONEYLINEFairleigh Dickinson -197

Fairleigh Dickinson
11-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreArmy 69
Projected Total143.7
Projected ScoreFairleigh Dickinson 75
Team Comparison
36.8MMH Power Index38.3
104.8Offensive Efficiency103.8
112.1Defensive Efficiency108.4
-7.3Net Efficiency-4.6
-3.3Strength of Schedule-5.8
-10.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
68.9Tempo64.7
49.8%Effective FG%48.6%
17.3%Turnover Rate18.2%
31.0%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
26.5%Free Throw Rate33.1%
-5.1Average Margin-3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fairleigh Dickinson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFairleigh Dickinson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (38.3–36.8), defensive efficiency (108.4–112.1), net efficiency (-4.6–-7.3), recent form (-4.7–-10.6).
Army COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (104.8–103.8), strength of schedule (-3.3–-5.8), shooting efficiency (49.8–48.6).