Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

27.6%Lipscomb

72.4%Marshall

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMarshall -6.7

PROJECTED TOTAL158.0

MODEL MONEYLINEMarshall -262

Marshall

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 76

Projected Total158.0

Projected ScoreMarshall 82

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricMarshall

47.9MMH Power Index52

111.3Offensive Efficiency114.7

107.6Defensive Efficiency110.3

3.7Net Efficiency4.4

-2.5Strength of Schedule0.9

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.9

68.8Tempo70.7

54.8%Effective FG%55.2%

16.0%Turnover Rate16.5%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %32.1%

26.5%Free Throw Rate29.7%

2.5Average Margin3.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Marshall HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMarshall holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.0–47.9), offensive efficiency (114.7–111.3), net efficiency (4.4–3.7), strength of schedule (0.9–-2.5).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–110.3), recent form (-1.0–-4.9), ball security (16.0–16.5).

Final

Lipscomb

90—67

Marshall

Lipscomb by 23 • 78.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATMarshall

30-57FG22-62

53.0%FG%35.0%

13-263PT6-26

50.0%3PT%23.0%

17-26FT17-22

65.0%FT%77.0%

35Rebounds39

6Offensive Rebounds12

19Assists9

15Turnovers17

9Steals7

2Blocks3

20Fouls22

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Titas Sargiunas	F	29	7-9	4-6	4-6	5	3	0	0	22
Grant Asman	F	32	7-9	4-6	0-0	6	1	0	0	18
Ethan Duncan	G	21	6-11	3-5	2-2	1	1	3	0	17
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	36	2-6	0-1	6-7	1	10	3	0	10
Kennedy Okpara	F	14	2-4	1-2	2-4	1	0	0	0	7
Charlie Williams	C	11	3-9	1-5	0-0	0	1	1	0	7
Cole Middleton	F	10	2-4	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	1	4
Or Ashkenazi	F	28	1-3	0-1	1-3	7	2	1	0	3
Kellan Boylan	F	19	0-2	0-0	2-4	6	0	1	1	2

Marshall

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Noah Otshudi	G	36	5-13	2-4	6-6	5	4	2	0	18
Wyatt Fricks	F	29	7-10	1-3	1-2	4	0	0	0	16
Jalen Speer	G	23	3-13	3-10	0-0	3	3	0	0	9
Kai Spears	G	13	1-1	0-0	7-7	4	0	2	0	9
Erich Harding	F	14	1-2	0-0	3-6	4	0	0	1	5
Landen Joseph	G	17	2-8	0-4	0-1	6	0	1	0	4
Bryce Slay	G	10	2-7	0-3	0-0	3	0	0	1	4
Matt Van Komen	C	9	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	2
Shamarrie Hugie	G	19	0-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	1	0
Wilson Dubinsky	G	15	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	1	0	0
Caleb Hollenbeck	G	13	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Drew Fuquay	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

78.0Possessions78.0

115.4Offensive Efficiency85.9

85.9Defensive Efficiency115.4

29.5Net Efficiency-29.5

64.0%Effective FG%40.3%

64.9%True Shooting %46.2%

19.1%Turnover Rate21.9%

45.6%Free Throw Rate35.5%

45.6%3-Point Rate41.9%

1.27Assist / Turnover0.53

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 23 points. The game played at approximately 78.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.