Samford

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

25.6%Samford

74.4%Utah Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUtah Valley -9.5

PROJECTED TOTAL153.9

MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Valley -291

Utah Valley

25-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSamford 72

Projected Total153.9

Projected ScoreUtah Valley 82

Team Comparison

SamfordMetricUtah Valley

54.1MMH Power Index59.1

113.5Offensive Efficiency113.4

108.3Defensive Efficiency97.3

5.2Net Efficiency16.1

-2.9Strength of Schedule-3.3

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

69.5Tempo70.6

54.0%Effective FG%56.0%

13.3%Turnover Rate19.9%

25.3%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

42.5%Free Throw Rate37.3%

3.6Average Margin11.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–54.1), defensive efficiency (97.3–108.3), net efficiency (16.1–5.2), shooting efficiency (56.0–54.0).

Samford COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (113.5–113.4), strength of schedule (-2.9–-3.3), recent form (14.0–6.8).

Final

Samford

45—89

Utah Valley

Utah Valley by 44 • 73.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SamfordTEAM STATUtah Valley

17-67FG35-62

25.0%FG%56.0%

6-273PT7-14

22.0%3PT%50.0%

5-12FT12-15

42.0%FT%80.0%

34Rebounds44

15Offensive Rebounds9

7Assists24

16Turnovers13

6Steals9

4Blocks10

15Fouls16

Player Box Score

Samford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Isaiah Campbell-Finch	G	32	5-11	2-3	0-5	1	0	1	0	12
Cade Norris	G	36	4-12	2-7	0-0	2	1	0	0	10
Kam Martin	G	32	2-9	0-3	1-1	4	0	1	0	5
Judson Bjornstad	F	15	1-5	1-2	2-2	2	0	0	1	5
Zion Wilburn	G	17	1-8	1-5	1-2	4	1	1	0	4
Jaxon Pollard	F	13	1-9	0-4	1-2	3	0	1	0	3
Jadin Booth	G	20	1-4	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Will Shaver	C	12	1-5	0-1	0-0	4	3	1	1	2
Caleb Harrison	F	10	1-4	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	2	2
Corey Brown	G	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Zach Lamey	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Utah Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jackson Holcombe	G	29	10-12	0-0	1-1	5	3	1	2	21
Trevan Leonhardt	G	27	6-10	2-2	1-1	4	4	4	0	15
Tyler Hendricks	G	21	4-6	3-4	0-0	6	1	0	2	11
Tyler Medaris	F	15	3-6	0-1	2-3	4	2	0	1	8
Isaac Hawkins	F	16	2-4	0-0	3-4	2	2	1	2	7
Noah Taitz	G	18	2-7	1-4	1-2	2	3	2	1	6
Isaac Davis	F	9	3-6	0-0	0-0	4	2	0	0	6
Sherman Weatherspoon IV	G	16	1-2	0-1	2-2	2	1	0	0	4
Joul Karram	C	7	2-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	1	4
AJ Riggs	G	5	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Braden Housley	G	22	0-3	0-1	2-2	4	5	0	0	2
Hayden Welling	F	5	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Tyler Weaver	F	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.4Possessions73.4

61.3Offensive Efficiency121.3

121.3Defensive Efficiency61.3

-59.9Net Efficiency59.9

29.9%Effective FG%62.1%

30.9%True Shooting %64.4%

21.7%Turnover Rate17.8%

17.9%Free Throw Rate24.2%

40.3%3-Point Rate22.6%

0.44Assist / Turnover1.85

Game Summary

Utah Valley won by 44 points. The game played at approximately 73.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.