
VCU
28-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.6%VCU
70.4%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -6.5
PROJECTED TOTAL160.3
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -238

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVCU 77
Projected Total160.3
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 83
Team Comparison
65.7MMH Power Index68.9
116.4Offensive Efficiency120.9
103.3Defensive Efficiency105.7
13.1Net Efficiency15.2
5.4Strength of Schedule7.4
6.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
69.5Tempo70.9
53.7%Effective FG%55.3%
15.1%Turnover Rate13.5%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
42.9%Free Throw Rate39.3%
9.1Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–65.7), offensive efficiency (120.9–116.4), net efficiency (15.2–13.1), strength of schedule (7.4–5.4).
VCU COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.3–105.7), recent form (6.0–2.7), offensive rebounding (31.7–30.8).