
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.0%Longwood
78.0%Siena
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSiena -8.3
PROJECTED TOTAL144.5
MODEL MONEYLINESiena -355

Siena
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 68
Projected Total144.5
Projected ScoreSiena 76
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index53.8
108.1Offensive Efficiency109.2
103.0Defensive Efficiency102.2
5.1Net Efficiency7.0
-6.4Strength of Schedule-0.5
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency3.0
71.9Tempo64.4
51.4%Effective FG%50.7%
19.3%Turnover Rate15.8%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
42.0%Free Throw Rate34.9%
3.6Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Siena HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSiena holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–47.0), offensive efficiency (109.2–108.1), defensive efficiency (102.2–103.0), net efficiency (7.0–5.1).
Longwood COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.4–50.7), offensive rebounding (35.4–31.4), free throw rate (42.0–34.9).