Hofstra

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

81.7%Hofstra

18.3%La Salle

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -9.1

PROJECTED TOTAL141.6

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -446

La Salle

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 75

Projected Total141.6

Projected ScoreLa Salle 66

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricLa Salle

59.3MMH Power Index41.3

114.0Offensive Efficiency100.8

100.9Defensive Efficiency111.3

13.1Net Efficiency-10.5

-2.9Strength of Schedule4.6

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-13.9

66.2Tempo66.5

52.2%Effective FG%46.2%

16.1%Turnover Rate18.2%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %33.8%

32.0%Free Throw Rate38.3%

8.7Average Margin-7.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–41.3), offensive efficiency (114.0–100.8), defensive efficiency (100.9–111.3), net efficiency (13.1–-10.5).

La Salle COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.6–-2.9), free throw rate (38.3–32.0).

Final

Hofstra

63—58

La Salle

Hofstra by 5 • 66.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATLa Salle

24-59FG23-58

41.0%FG%40.0%

9-263PT3-15

35.0%3PT%20.0%

6-11FT9-12

55.0%FT%75.0%

33Rebounds38

10Offensive Rebounds12

13Assists14

13Turnovers14

5Steals6

5Blocks5

14Fouls15

Player Box Score

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cruz Davis	G	40	9-18	3-7	1-2	3	5	2	0	22
Biggie Patterson	G	30	5-12	1-4	2-2	5	1	2	0	13
German Plotnikov	G	34	5-13	2-7	0-0	4	0	0	1	12
Preston Edmead	G	37	3-9	3-7	2-3	0	5	0	0	11
Joshua DeCady	F	17	1-2	0-0	0-2	4	0	0	0	2
Victory Onuetu	F	16	1-2	0-0	0-0	5	1	0	2	2
Silas Sunday	F	20	0-2	0-0	1-2	6	0	1	2	1
Alex Tsynkevich	C	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
A.J. Wills	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

La Salle

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jerome Brewer Jr.	F	22	6-13	1-3	0-0	6	0	1	1	13
Eric Acker	G	34	4-8	0-1	1-2	2	6	1	0	9
Jaeden Marshall	G	28	2-8	0-6	4-4	3	0	0	0	8
Ashton Walker	G	27	3-6	1-2	0-0	3	2	0	0	7
Justin Archer	F	18	2-2	0-0	3-4	6	0	0	1	7
Rob Dockery	G	22	2-3	1-1	0-0	3	2	1	0	5
Edwin Daniel	F	16	2-6	0-0	1-2	4	2	1	3	5
Noah Collier	F	10	2-4	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	4
Josiah Harris	F	14	0-5	0-0	0-0	5	1	0	0	0
Damon Strand	G	9	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	2	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.5Possessions66.5

94.7Offensive Efficiency87.2

87.2Defensive Efficiency94.7

7.5Net Efficiency-7.5

48.3%Effective FG%42.2%

49.0%True Shooting %45.5%

19.3%Turnover Rate21.3%

18.6%Free Throw Rate20.7%

44.1%3-Point Rate25.9%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 66.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.