
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
8.1%Queens University
91.9%Virginia
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVirginia -17.0
PROJECTED TOTAL162.6
MODEL MONEYLINEVirginia -1135

Virginia
30-6MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 73
Projected Total162.6
Projected ScoreVirginia 90
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index68.9
118.4Offensive Efficiency119.0
117.0Defensive Efficiency101.8
1.4Net Efficiency17.2
0.1Strength of Schedule5.2
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency6.4
71.4Tempo67.6
56.6%Effective FG%55.0%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.0%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %37.4%
37.6%Free Throw Rate33.2%
0.9Average Margin11.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Virginia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY91.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVirginia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–51.7), offensive efficiency (119.0–118.4), defensive efficiency (101.8–117.0), net efficiency (17.2–1.4).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (56.6–55.0), ball security (14.8–16.0), free throw rate (37.6–33.2).