
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.7%Merrimack
60.3%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -3.6
PROJECTED TOTAL142.7
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -152

Pennsylvania
18-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 70
Projected Total142.7
Projected ScorePennsylvania 73
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index52.9
106.4Offensive Efficiency108.6
103.2Defensive Efficiency106.4
3.2Net Efficiency2.2
0.7Strength of Schedule1.9
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
64.4Tempo69.9
49.3%Effective FG%50.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.4%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
39.5%Free Throw Rate36.3%
2.1Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–52.9), defensive efficiency (103.2–106.4), net efficiency (3.2–2.2), recent form (12.9–2.3).
Pennsylvania COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (108.6–106.4), strength of schedule (1.9–0.7), shooting efficiency (50.9–49.3).