Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

35.7%Texas A&M

64.3%Florida State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida State -3.6

PROJECTED TOTAL160.4

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida State -180

Florida State

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 78

Projected Total160.4

Projected ScoreFlorida State 82

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricFlorida State

58MMH Power Index58.7

116.1Offensive Efficiency111.9

108.4Defensive Efficiency108.5

7.7Net Efficiency3.4

4.8Strength of Schedule5.7

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency7.6

69.1Tempo71.8

53.5%Effective FG%52.4%

14.8%Turnover Rate15.2%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.3%

37.5%Free Throw Rate35.2%

5.3Average Margin2.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (116.1–111.9), defensive efficiency (108.4–108.5), net efficiency (7.7–3.4), shooting efficiency (53.5–52.4).

Florida State COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (58.7–58.0), strength of schedule (5.7–4.8), recent form (7.6–-7.2).

Final

Texas A&M

95—59

Florida State

Texas A&M by 36 • 75.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATFlorida State

30-68FG21-73

44.0%FG%29.0%

15-343PT9-41

44.0%3PT%22.0%

20-25FT8-17

80.0%FT%47.0%

60Rebounds40

22Offensive Rebounds20

20Assists13

16Turnovers16

13Steals11

—Blocks5

18Fouls18

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Rubén Dominguez	G	27	7-13	7-12	0-0	4	1	0	21
Rashaun Agee	F	26	4-11	0-2	9-12	17	1	1	17
Pop Isaacs	G	21	4-9	3-6	4-4	3	3	1	15
Mackenzie Mgbako	F	18	3-8	2-6	2-2	5	1	0	10
Josh Holloway	G	13	3-3	0-0	2-2	3	3	2	8
Marcus Hill	G	22	3-8	1-3	0-0	3	5	3	7
Jacari Lane	G	23	2-7	2-5	0-0	3	3	2	6
Ali Dibba	G	15	2-5	0-0	1-2	2	1	3	5
Jamie Vinson	F	11	1-2	0-0	2-3	5	1	0	4
Federiko Federiko	F	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	2
Zach Clemence	F	19	0-1	0-0	0-0	8	1	0	0

Florida State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kobe MaGee	G	25	7-15	4-10	3-4	3	0	1	0	21
Martin Somerville	G	22	3-6	3-6	0-0	5	0	5	0	9
Chauncey Wiggins	F	24	3-14	1-6	0-0	5	0	0	0	7
Cam Miles	G	22	3-10	0-6	1-2	1	0	2	0	7
AJ Swinton	F	12	2-3	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	1	4
Lajae Jones	G	25	1-8	1-6	0-0	5	0	0	1	3
Shah Muhammad	F	13	1-1	0-0	1-3	4	0	0	0	3
Robert McCray V	G	28	1-10	0-4	0-0	3	11	1	1	2
Alex Steen	F	16	0-1	0-0	2-4	7	1	2	2	2
Thomas Bassong	F	11	0-4	0-1	1-4	1	0	0	0	1
Alier Maluk	F	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.5Possessions75.5

125.8Offensive Efficiency78.1

78.1Defensive Efficiency125.8

47.7Net Efficiency-47.7

55.1%Effective FG%34.9%

59.5%True Shooting %36.4%

21.7%Turnover Rate20.8%

36.8%Free Throw Rate23.3%

50.0%3-Point Rate56.2%

1.25Assist / Turnover0.81

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 36 points. The game played at approximately 75.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.