
Wisconsin
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.6%Wisconsin
49.4%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL157.3
MODEL MONEYLINEWisconsin -102

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWisconsin 78
Projected Total157.3
Projected ScoreTCU 79
Team Comparison
64.5MMH Power Index59.7
118.6Offensive Efficiency110.2
108.8Defensive Efficiency102.7
9.8Net Efficiency7.5
6.7Strength of Schedule4.6
5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
69.9Tempo70.2
54.6%Effective FG%50.5%
12.8%Turnover Rate15.3%
28.7%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
32.5%Free Throw Rate38.3%
6.9Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Wisconsin HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWisconsin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.5–59.7), offensive efficiency (118.6–110.2), net efficiency (9.8–7.5), strength of schedule (6.7–4.6).
TCU COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–108.8), offensive rebounding (33.6–28.7), free throw rate (38.3–32.5).