Wisconsin logo

Wisconsin

24-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.6%Wisconsin
49.4%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL157.3
MODEL MONEYLINEWisconsin -102
TCU logo

TCU

23-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWisconsin 78
Projected Total157.3
Projected ScoreTCU 79

Team Comparison

64.5MMH Power Index59.7
118.6Offensive Efficiency110.2
108.8Defensive Efficiency102.7
9.8Net Efficiency7.5
6.7Strength of Schedule4.6
5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
69.9Tempo70.2
54.6%Effective FG%50.5%
12.8%Turnover Rate15.3%
28.7%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
32.5%Free Throw Rate38.3%
6.9Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Wisconsin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWisconsin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.5–59.7), offensive efficiency (118.6–110.2), net efficiency (9.8–7.5), strength of schedule (6.7–4.6).
TCU COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–108.8), offensive rebounding (33.6–28.7), free throw rate (38.3–32.5).
Final
Wisconsin logo
Wisconsin
63—74
TCU logo
TCU
TCU by 11 • 74.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WisconsinTEAM STATTCU
20-58FG28-60
34.0%FG%47.0%
7-283PT8-14
25.0%3PT%57.0%
16-18FT10-16
89.0%FT%63.0%
35Rebounds37
8Offensive Rebounds8
10Assists15
17Turnovers13
9Steals6
3Blocks7
15Fouls16

Player Box Score

Wisconsin
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
John BlackwellG348-223-811-1260300030
Nick BoydG336-131-42-213200015
Andrew RohdeG313-61-40-03110007
Braeden CarringtonG182-52-50-01011006
Nolan WinterF360-30-23-410312003
Austin RappF221-60-30-05100002
Jack JanickiG130-10-10-00210000
Aleksas BieliauskasF100-20-10-06000000
Will GarlockF30-00-00-00000000
TCU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
David PunchF327-111-12-292220017
Brock HardingG366-92-32-345100016
Xavier EdmondsF186-80-00-031110012
Jayden PierreG324-112-21-234020011
Liutauras LeleviciusG284-53-40-051110011
Micah RobinsonF281-50-25-74101007
Jace PoseyG140-70-00-27010000
Tanner ToolsonG120-40-20-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

74.1Possessions74.1
85.0Offensive Efficiency99.9
99.9Defensive Efficiency85.0
-14.8Net Efficiency14.8
40.5%Effective FG%53.3%
47.3%True Shooting %54.7%
22.5%Turnover Rate17.9%
31.0%Free Throw Rate26.7%
48.3%3-Point Rate23.3%
0.59Assist / Turnover1.15
Game Summary
TCU won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 74.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.