Alabama A&M

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.8%Alabama A&M

92.2%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -16.4

PROJECTED TOTAL140.0

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -1182

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 62

Projected Total140.0

Projected ScoreClemson 78

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricClemson

42.3MMH Power Index59.9

105.9Offensive Efficiency112.6

106.6Defensive Efficiency101.4

-0.7Net Efficiency11.2

-6.8Strength of Schedule4.6

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

68.0Tempo63.6

49.7%Effective FG%53.0%

16.8%Turnover Rate14.0%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

45.7%Free Throw Rate38.1%

-0.5Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–42.3), offensive efficiency (112.6–105.9), defensive efficiency (101.4–106.6), net efficiency (11.2–-0.7).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHrecent form (3.3–-4.7), offensive rebounding (28.0–27.0), free throw rate (45.7–38.1).

Final

Alabama A&M

56—92

Clemson

Clemson by 36 • 70.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATClemson

20-54FG30-55

37.0%FG%55.0%

4-223PT8-23

18.0%3PT%35.0%

12-17FT24-32

71.0%FT%75.0%

23Rebounds44

3Offensive Rebounds10

5Assists18

11Turnovers11

4Steals5

1Blocks1

26Fouls17

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kintavious Dozier	G	25	4-10	0-1	2-4	2	0	0	0	10
James Graham III	G	21	4-10	1-4	1-1	3	0	0	0	10
PJ Eason	F	15	3-4	0-0	4-4	5	0	1	0	10
Peyton Daniels Sr.	G	19	3-6	3-6	0-0	1	1	2	1	9
Sami Pissis	G	16	2-4	0-2	2-2	0	1	0	0	6
Koron Davis	G	19	1-5	0-1	2-2	5	1	1	0	4
Lou Hutchinson	G	31	1-6	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Angok Anyang	F	22	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	8	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Gabe Kincy	G	14	0-3	0-3	1-2	2	1	0	0	1
Samuel Onu	F	6	0-1	0-1	0-2	0	0	0	0	0
Tajden Davis	G	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jestin Porter	G	20	4-10	2-6	4-5	2	1	1	0	14
Carter Welling	F	18	2-3	0-1	8-8	7	3	0	1	12
RJ Godfrey	F	20	4-7	0-0	2-2	8	1	0	0	10
Butta Johnson	G	21	4-7	1-4	0-0	4	3	3	0	9
Zac Foster	G	22	2-4	1-2	3-5	1	3	0	0	8
Dillon Hunter	G	20	3-5	1-1	1-1	3	3	1	0	8
Chase Thompson	F	18	3-4	1-2	0-0	5	1	0	0	7
Nick Davidson	F	16	2-5	0-1	2-2	6	2	0	0	6
Ace Buckner	G	15	2-5	0-3	1-2	3	0	0	0	5
Jake Wahlin	F	13	2-2	1-1	0-1	2	0	0	0	5
Dallas Thomas	F	13	1-2	1-2	1-2	1	1	0	0	4
Trent Steinour	F	4	1-1	0-0	2-4	0	0	0	0	4

Advanced Game Stats

70.7Possessions70.7

79.2Offensive Efficiency130.1

130.1Defensive Efficiency79.2

-50.9Net Efficiency50.9

40.7%Effective FG%61.8%

45.1%True Shooting %65.5%

15.7%Turnover Rate15.4%

31.5%Free Throw Rate58.2%

40.7%3-Point Rate41.8%

0.45Assist / Turnover1.64

Game Summary

Clemson won by 36 points. The game played at approximately 70.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.