SMU logo

SMU

20-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
81.5%SMU
18.5%Mississippi State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -8.5
PROJECTED TOTAL165.4
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -441
Mississippi State logo

Mississippi State

13-19
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 87
Projected Total165.4
Projected ScoreMississippi State 78

Team Comparison

62.5MMH Power Index44.6
118.2Offensive Efficiency107.4
109.6Defensive Efficiency113.2
8.6Net Efficiency-5.8
7.0Strength of Schedule5.0
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.5
71.1Tempo72.3
55.7%Effective FG%51.6%
15.7%Turnover Rate16.1%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %29.8%
31.3%Free Throw Rate30.9%
6.1Average Margin-4.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–44.6), offensive efficiency (118.2–107.4), defensive efficiency (109.6–113.2), net efficiency (8.6–-5.8).
Final
SMU logo
SMU
87—81
Mississippi State logo
Mississippi State
SMU by 6 • 79.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SMUTEAM STATMississippi State
32-72FG27-70
44.0%FG%39.0%
8-273PT8-28
30.0%3PT%29.0%
15-23FT19-25
65.0%FT%76.0%
50Rebounds40
14Offensive Rebounds9
16Assists11
11Turnovers7
3Steals9
4Blocks2
16Fouls23

Player Box Score

SMU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Boopie MillerG399-195-95-593200028
Jaron Pierre Jr.G4011-211-51-162020024
Corey WashingtonF413-90-56-8102000012
B.J. EdwardsG413-120-40-36310006
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.F162-52-40-00100006
Jaden ToombsC112-30-02-36200006
Samet YigitogluC352-20-01-313302005
Mitchell HolmesF20-10-00-00000000
Mississippi State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jayden EppsG338-173-62-213400021
Ja'Borri McGheeG306-123-72-301000017
Josh HubbardG395-191-75-532100016
Quincy BallardC324-80-04-4100010012
Shawn Jones Jr.G331-51-53-47200006
Achor AchorF381-40-23-712231005
Brandon WalkerF62-30-00-02000004
Jamarion Davis-FlemingF70-00-00-02000000
Amier AliG70-20-10-01110000

Advanced Game Stats

79.9Possessions79.9
108.9Offensive Efficiency101.4
101.4Defensive Efficiency108.9
7.5Net Efficiency-7.5
50.0%Effective FG%44.3%
52.5%True Shooting %49.5%
13.8%Turnover Rate8.8%
31.9%Free Throw Rate35.7%
37.5%3-Point Rate40.0%
1.45Assist / Turnover1.57
Game Summary
SMU won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 79.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.