
LSU
15-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.9%LSU
41.1%Drake
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLSU -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL158.1
MODEL MONEYLINELSU -143

Drake
14-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLSU 80
Projected Total158.1
Projected ScoreDrake 79
Team Comparison
54.2MMH Power Index46.4
115.5Offensive Efficiency109.5
111.3Defensive Efficiency109.1
4.2Net Efficiency0.4
4.5Strength of Schedule0.3
-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.3
70.5Tempo68.6
53.4%Effective FG%52.2%
15.6%Turnover Rate14.9%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %27.2%
41.9%Free Throw Rate34.4%
2.9Average Margin0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
LSU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLSU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.2–46.4), offensive efficiency (115.5–109.5), net efficiency (4.2–0.4), strength of schedule (4.5–0.3).
Drake COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.1–111.3), recent form (-11.3–-12.8), ball security (14.9–15.6).