Merrimack

23-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

24.4%Merrimack

75.6%Hofstra

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -8.7

PROJECTED TOTAL137.8

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -310

Hofstra

24-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMerrimack 65

Projected Total137.8

Projected ScoreHofstra 73

Team Comparison

MerrimackMetricHofstra

53.7MMH Power Index59.3

106.4Offensive Efficiency114.0

103.2Defensive Efficiency100.9

3.2Net Efficiency13.1

0.7Strength of Schedule-2.9

12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

64.4Tempo66.2

49.3%Effective FG%52.2%

14.8%Turnover Rate16.1%

24.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

39.5%Free Throw Rate32.0%

2.1Average Margin8.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–53.7), offensive efficiency (114.0–106.4), defensive efficiency (100.9–103.2), net efficiency (13.1–3.2).

Merrimack COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–-2.9), ball security (14.8–16.1), free throw rate (39.5–32.0).

Final

Merrimack

58—78

Hofstra

Hofstra by 20 • 67.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MerrimackTEAM STATHofstra

18-59FG26-56

31.0%FG%46.0%

10-333PT9-21

30.0%3PT%43.0%

12-14FT17-20

86.0%FT%85.0%

28Rebounds43

9Offensive Rebounds11

13Assists18

9Turnovers14

9Steals4

7Blocks4

16Fouls13

Player Box Score

Merrimack

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ernest Shelton	G	32	4-11	2-7	2-2	4	0	0	0	12
Tye Dorset	G	30	4-9	4-7	0-0	4	4	1	0	12
Kevair Kennedy	G	23	3-9	0-1	4-4	1	1	3	0	10
Todd Brogna	F	21	2-7	2-6	2-2	3	2	1	0	8
Andrés Marrero	G	21	2-6	2-4	0-0	1	0	1	0	6
KC Ugwuakazi	F	26	1-3	0-1	3-4	3	2	1	5	5
Brendan Johnson	G	6	1-5	0-3	1-1	0	0	0	0	3
Dylan Veillette	F	8	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	0	1	1	2
Malik Edmead	G	14	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	1	0
Jaylen Stinson	G	13	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Aliou Cisse	F	6	0-3	0-2	0-1	2	1	0	0	0

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Preston Edmead	G	32	5-12	5-11	7-7	2	5	2	0	22
Cruz Davis	G	37	5-14	3-4	2-3	4	8	0	0	15
Silas Sunday	F	20	7-8	0-0	1-1	7	0	0	3	15
German Plotnikov	G	37	3-5	1-3	0-0	2	4	1	0	7
Joshua DeCady	F	20	2-3	0-0	3-5	3	1	0	0	7
Victory Onuetu	F	15	3-4	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	0	6
Biggie Patterson	G	19	1-6	0-1	2-2	8	0	0	0	4
Alex Tsynkevich	C	5	0-0	0-0	2-2	3	0	0	0	2
A.J. Wills	G	9	0-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Jaeden Roberts	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Amir Williams	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Joshua Aaron Reaves	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.1Possessions67.1

86.4Offensive Efficiency116.2

116.2Defensive Efficiency86.4

-29.8Net Efficiency29.8

39.0%Effective FG%54.5%

44.2%True Shooting %59.5%

13.7%Turnover Rate20.4%

23.7%Free Throw Rate35.7%

55.9%3-Point Rate37.5%

1.44Assist / Turnover1.29

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 67.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.