Bryant

9-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.1%Bryant

92.9%Harvard

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -16.8

PROJECTED TOTAL135.9

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -1308

Harvard

17-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBryant 60

Projected Total135.9

Projected ScoreHarvard 76

Team Comparison

BryantMetricHarvard

34.1MMH Power Index52.6

98.6Offensive Efficiency108.1

110.2Defensive Efficiency102.9

-11.6Net Efficiency5.2

-1.3Strength of Schedule-0.1

-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3

65.8Tempo64.8

48.0%Effective FG%53.4%

20.0%Turnover Rate17.2%

28.1%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

31.2%Free Throw Rate27.9%

-7.6Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–34.1), offensive efficiency (108.1–98.6), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.2), net efficiency (5.2–-11.6).

Bryant COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (28.1–26.3), free throw rate (31.2–27.9).

Final

Bryant

53—56

Harvard

Harvard by 3 • 58.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BryantTEAM STATHarvard

19-58FG24-58

33.0%FG%41.0%

9-283PT6-19

32.0%3PT%32.0%

6-7FT2-2

86.0%FT%100.0%

34Rebounds40

12Offensive Rebounds12

12Assists13

10Turnovers10

9Steals7

3Blocks3

8Fouls7

Player Box Score

Bryant

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ty Tabales	G	36	5-15	5-12	0-0	1	6	4	1	15
Timofei Rudovskii	F	35	5-10	3-5	2-2	8	3	1	0	15
Keegan Harvey	F	32	3-9	0-1	2-2	10	0	0	1	8
Aaron Davis III	F	21	2-6	1-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Jakai Robinson	G	21	1-4	0-1	2-3	4	2	0	0	4
Ashley Sims II	F	34	1-8	0-3	0-0	6	1	4	0	2
Gio Sanford	F	7	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Ethane Bourgade	F	6	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	2
Lennart Weber	F	8	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chandler Pigge	G	37	7-12	1-2	0-0	5	5	2	1	15
Thomas Batties III	F	31	5-10	2-3	0-0	9	1	0	1	12
Robert Hinton	G	36	4-12	1-3	2-2	8	2	1	0	11
Tey Barbour	G	33	4-10	2-7	0-0	7	3	1	0	10
Austin Hunt	G	15	2-7	0-2	0-0	4	2	0	0	4
Kenan Parrish	F	4	2-5	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Ben Eisendrath	G	33	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	2	1	0
Ryan Sullivan	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Frankie Mannino	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Xavier Nesbitt	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

58.2Possessions58.2

91.1Offensive Efficiency96.2

96.2Defensive Efficiency91.1

-5.2Net Efficiency5.2

40.5%Effective FG%46.6%

43.2%True Shooting %47.5%

16.9%Turnover Rate17.6%

12.1%Free Throw Rate3.4%

48.3%3-Point Rate32.8%

1.20Assist / Turnover1.30

Game Summary

Harvard won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 58.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.