
DePaul
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.0%DePaul
76.0%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLSU -7.7
PROJECTED TOTAL151.6
MODEL MONEYLINELSU -317

LSU
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDePaul 72
Projected Total151.6
Projected ScoreLSU 80
Team Comparison
48.4MMH Power Index54.2
103.7Offensive Efficiency115.5
102.7Defensive Efficiency111.3
1.0Net Efficiency4.2
2.0Strength of Schedule4.5
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8
67.7Tempo70.5
49.9%Effective FG%53.4%
17.8%Turnover Rate15.6%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
36.8%Free Throw Rate41.9%
0.7Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
LSU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLSU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.2–48.4), offensive efficiency (115.5–103.7), net efficiency (4.2–1.0), strength of schedule (4.5–2.0).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–111.3), recent form (-6.6–-12.8).