
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
70.5%Merrimack
29.5%La Salle
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL137.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -239

La Salle
9-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 71
Projected Total137.1
Projected ScoreLa Salle 66
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index41.3
106.4Offensive Efficiency100.8
103.2Defensive Efficiency111.3
3.2Net Efficiency-10.5
0.7Strength of Schedule4.6
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-13.9
64.4Tempo66.5
49.3%Effective FG%46.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate18.2%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
39.5%Free Throw Rate38.3%
2.1Average Margin-7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY70.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–41.3), offensive efficiency (106.4–100.8), defensive efficiency (103.2–111.3), net efficiency (3.2–-10.5).
La Salle COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.6–0.7), offensive rebounding (33.8–24.7).