Stonehill

12-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.3%Stonehill

87.7%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -12.7

PROJECTED TOTAL140.9

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -713

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreStonehill 64

Projected Total140.9

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 77

Team Comparison

StonehillMetricQuinnipiac

37.9MMH Power Index51

97.5Offensive Efficiency106.8

100.7Defensive Efficiency102.1

-3.2Net Efficiency4.7

-5.4Strength of Schedule-2.3

-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

68.1Tempo70.5

48.0%Effective FG%48.9%

19.1%Turnover Rate15.6%

28.4%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

29.2%Free Throw Rate34.1%

-2.2Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–37.9), offensive efficiency (106.8–97.5), net efficiency (4.7–-3.2), strength of schedule (-2.3–-5.4).

Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–102.1).

Final

Stonehill

62—76

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac by 14 • 69.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StonehillTEAM STATQuinnipiac

25-64FG29-61

39.0%FG%48.0%

8-263PT8-16

31.0%3PT%50.0%

4-8FT10-12

50.0%FT%83.0%

37Rebounds29

14Offensive Rebounds7

11Assists9

15Turnovers10

5Steals12

4Blocks6

11Fouls14

Player Box Score

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Raymond Espinal-Guzman	F	38	6-13	3-5	2-4	6	0	0	2	17
Hermann Koffi	G	33	6-11	3-5	0-0	4	0	0	0	15
Davante Hackett	G	38	6-20	1-8	0-0	9	2	2	0	13
Chas Stinson	G	30	3-6	0-0	1-2	11	5	1	2	7
Trenton Ruth	G	12	2-5	0-1	0-0	2	1	1	0	4
Rex Sunderland	G	31	1-6	0-5	1-2	4	2	0	0	3
Anthony Holden	G	5	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Pearse McGuinn	F	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Cory Lovell	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaden Zimmerman	G	37	7-12	3-5	5-6	2	1	1	1	22
Amarri Monroe	F	32	9-16	0-2	0-0	7	1	5	1	18
Asim Jones	G	31	7-15	2-3	2-2	3	4	1	1	18
Grant Randall	F	27	2-5	1-3	1-2	4	0	1	0	6
Tai Turnage	G	11	2-5	1-2	0-0	3	0	1	1	5
Keith McKnight	G	21	1-5	0-0	2-2	5	2	1	0	4
Samson Reilly	G	9	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Nate Guerengomba	G	15	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	1	0	0
Spence Wewe	F	12	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	2	0
Sam Nosakhare	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Ronell Giles Jr.	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.3Possessions69.3

89.5Offensive Efficiency109.7

109.7Defensive Efficiency89.5

-20.2Net Efficiency20.2

45.3%Effective FG%54.1%

45.7%True Shooting %57.0%

21.8%Turnover Rate14.3%

12.5%Free Throw Rate19.7%

40.6%3-Point Rate26.2%

0.73Assist / Turnover0.90

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 69.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.