
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.1%Hofstra
44.9%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -1.0
PROJECTED TOTAL147.4
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -123

Pennsylvania
18-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 74
Projected Total147.4
Projected ScorePennsylvania 73
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index52.9
114.0Offensive Efficiency108.6
100.9Defensive Efficiency106.4
13.1Net Efficiency2.2
-2.9Strength of Schedule1.9
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
66.2Tempo69.9
52.2%Effective FG%50.9%
16.1%Turnover Rate15.4%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
32.0%Free Throw Rate36.3%
8.7Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY55.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–52.9), offensive efficiency (114.0–108.6), defensive efficiency (100.9–106.4), net efficiency (13.1–2.2).
Pennsylvania COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.9–-2.9), ball security (15.4–16.1), free throw rate (36.3–32.0).