
Fordham
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.5%Fordham
58.5%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -2.1
PROJECTED TOTAL143.3
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -141

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFordham 71
Projected Total143.3
Projected ScoreColgate 73
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index48.8
105.9Offensive Efficiency111.7
99.3Defensive Efficiency109.0
6.6Net Efficiency2.7
-2.4Strength of Schedule-2.0
-0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
65.9Tempo68.4
50.0%Effective FG%54.5%
17.3%Turnover Rate14.8%
34.5%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
26.9%Free Throw Rate30.0%
4.4Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (111.7–105.9), strength of schedule (-2.0–-2.4), recent form (-0.3–-0.9), shooting efficiency (54.5–50.0).
Fordham COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (50.3–48.8), defensive efficiency (99.3–109.0), net efficiency (6.6–2.7).