Florida A&M

14-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

32.5%Florida A&M

67.5%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -6.7

PROJECTED TOTAL142.5

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -208

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 68

Projected Total142.5

Projected ScoreGrambling 75

Team Comparison

Florida A&MMetricGrambling

39.4MMH Power Index41.4

98.7Offensive Efficiency100.7

105.6Defensive Efficiency100.4

-6.9Net Efficiency0.3

-3.2Strength of Schedule-5.7

4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

70.6Tempo69.9

49.2%Effective FG%49.2%

21.6%Turnover Rate20.9%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

38.0%Free Throw Rate42.2%

-4.8Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–39.4), offensive efficiency (100.7–98.7), defensive efficiency (100.4–105.6), net efficiency (0.3–-6.9).

Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.2–-5.7), recent form (4.5–-0.4), offensive rebounding (30.5–30.4).

Final

Florida A&M

72—79

Grambling

Grambling by 7 • 63.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida A&MTEAM STATGrambling

24-55FG24-46

44.0%FG%52.0%

8-183PT4-12

44.0%3PT%33.0%

16-19FT27-35

84.0%FT%77.0%

29Rebounds29

10Offensive Rebounds8

7Assists14

11Turnovers8

3Steals5

2Blocks4

25Fouls21

Player Box Score

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Milton Matthews III	G	37	9-18	5-10	4-4	3	0	1	0	27
Sterling Young	G	35	7-17	2-7	3-3	2	3	0	0	19
Ja'Derryus Eatmon	Forward	25	2-3	0-0	2-3	2	0	0	1	6
Jocobi Hendricks	Guard	10	2-3	1-1	1-1	3	0	0	0	6
Shaqir O'Neal	F	18	1-4	0-0	3-4	2	0	1	0	5
Saiyd Burnside	Forward	17	1-2	0-0	3-4	3	0	0	0	5
Roderick Coffee III	F	29	1-3	0-0	0-0	7	2	1	0	2
Trey Lewis	Guard	13	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
Jamine Charles	Forward	14	0-2	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	1	0
Alex Andrews	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Malcolm Stute	G	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Antwan Burnett	G	34	6-9	1-1	5-7	2	2	3	0	18
Cbo Newton	G	20	5-7	1-2	6-6	2	3	0	0	17
PJ Eason	F	32	5-10	0-0	2-2	7	1	0	2	12
Mikale Stevenson	G	31	2-6	1-3	6-6	4	1	2	0	11
Ernest Ross	Forward	22	2-4	0-2	2-3	4	0	0	2	6
Emeka Nnaji	Forward	7	2-3	0-0	2-4	3	0	0	0	6
Lou Hutchinson	G	15	1-4	0-2	1-2	3	0	0	0	3
Dupree Fletcher	Guard	12	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	2	0	0	3
Kintavious Dozier	G	12	0-1	0-1	2-2	3	4	0	0	2
P.J. Edwards	G	15	0-1	0-0	1-3	1	1	0	0	1

Advanced Game Stats

63.8Possessions63.8

112.9Offensive Efficiency123.8

123.8Defensive Efficiency112.9

-11.0Net Efficiency11.0

50.9%Effective FG%56.5%

56.2%True Shooting %63.1%

16.9%Turnover Rate12.8%

34.5%Free Throw Rate76.1%

32.7%3-Point Rate26.1%

0.64Assist / Turnover1.75

Game Summary

Grambling won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 63.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.