Lehigh logo

Lehigh

18-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
70.8%Lehigh
29.2%Binghamton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLehigh -4.3
PROJECTED TOTAL142.3
MODEL MONEYLINELehigh -242
Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLehigh 73
Projected Total142.3
Projected ScoreBinghamton 69

Team Comparison

44.9MMH Power Index32.4
105.1Offensive Efficiency102.2
106.7Defensive Efficiency112.3
-1.6Net Efficiency-10.1
-1.7Strength of Schedule-6.0
3.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2
69.2Tempo64.2
53.3%Effective FG%51.3%
17.7%Turnover Rate18.5%
23.6%Offensive Rebound %21.5%
32.5%Free Throw Rate42.8%
-1.1Average Margin-6.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Lehigh HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY70.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLehigh holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.9–32.4), offensive efficiency (105.1–102.2), defensive efficiency (106.7–112.3), net efficiency (-1.6–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.8–32.5).
Final
Lehigh logo
Lehigh
71—80
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
Binghamton by 9 • 71.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LehighTEAM STATBinghamton
27-67FG27-46
40.0%FG%59.0%
9-313PT4-10
29.0%3PT%40.0%
8-12FT22-33
67.0%FT%67.0%
35Rebounds35
12Offensive Rebounds4
8Assists10
11Turnovers14
6Steals11
1Blocks2
24Fouls16

Player Box Score

Lehigh
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Joshua IngramG4110-174-91-160110025
Nasir WhitlockG358-183-102-355200021
Caleb ThomasG344-91-30-11100009
Peter KramerG271-81-52-26000005
Hank AlveyF221-40-03-54100005
Andrew UrosevicG152-50-20-00020004
Tommy ConniffC121-10-00-02110002
Jake PikeF170-20-10-04000000
Jalen VazquezG110-20-10-02000000
Alfredo AddesaF90-10-00-01000000
Henri AdiassaC20-00-00-00000000
Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zyier BeverlyF429-111-16-881310025
Jeremiah QuigleyG457-101-17-1054100022
Demetrius LilleyC444-80-27-11102310015
Jackson BenigniG345-82-51-230200013
Bryson WilsonG211-50-11-23110003
Wes Peterson Jr.G391-40-00-04210002

Advanced Game Stats

71.7Possessions71.7
99.0Offensive Efficiency111.6
111.6Defensive Efficiency99.0
-12.6Net Efficiency12.6
47.0%Effective FG%63.0%
48.8%True Shooting %64.9%
15.3%Turnover Rate19.5%
17.9%Free Throw Rate71.7%
46.3%3-Point Rate21.7%
0.73Assist / Turnover0.71
Game Summary
Binghamton won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 71.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.