William & Mary

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.9%William & Mary

54.1%Duquesne

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADDuquesne -2.1

PROJECTED TOTAL161.0

MODEL MONEYLINEDuquesne -118

Duquesne

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 79

Projected Total161.0

Projected ScoreDuquesne 82

Team Comparison

William & MaryMetricDuquesne

53.8MMH Power Index50.7

112.5Offensive Efficiency110.6

105.2Defensive Efficiency106.2

7.3Net Efficiency4.4

-1.5Strength of Schedule0.6

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9

73.9Tempo70.8

55.3%Effective FG%53.4%

16.4%Turnover Rate17.7%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

45.3%Free Throw Rate38.2%

5.4Average Margin3.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–50.7), offensive efficiency (112.5–110.6), defensive efficiency (105.2–106.2), net efficiency (7.3–4.4).

Duquesne COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.6–-1.5), offensive rebounding (30.6–26.7).

Final

William & Mary

83—79

Duquesne

William & Mary by 4 • 77.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATDuquesne

28-55FG27-59

51.0%FG%46.0%

15-303PT8-29

50.0%3PT%28.0%

12-14FT17-24

86.0%FT%71.0%

24Rebounds36

4Offensive Rebounds13

20Assists13

18Turnovers21

9Steals9

1Blocks3

19Fouls18

Player Box Score

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	F	26	6-11	3-6	2-2	1	2	1	0	17
Cade Haskins	F	23	6-10	4-8	0-0	1	1	0	0	16
Kilian Brockhoff	F	27	5-7	4-6	0-0	1	4	1	0	14
Jo'el Emanuel	F	30	3-7	2-2	4-4	2	1	2	0	12
Reese Miller	G	28	3-8	2-5	2-4	3	3	0	0	10
Chase Lowe	G	26	4-6	0-0	0-0	6	7	2	0	8
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	21	1-3	0-0	2-2	3	2	1	1	4
Jhei-R Jones	G	17	0-2	0-2	2-2	1	0	2	0	2
Kaleb Spencer	F	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Duquesne

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jimmie Williams	G	23	7-13	1-6	1-1	5	1	2	1	16
Tarence Guinyard	G	32	5-12	1-5	2-3	2	4	1	0	13
Alex Williams	F	13	4-6	2-4	2-2	2	0	1	0	12
Jakub Necas	F	27	2-3	1-2	6-8	3	0	2	1	11
David Dixon	F	23	4-5	0-0	3-4	3	1	2	1	11
Maximus Edwards	G	26	3-11	1-4	1-2	7	2	0	0	8
Cam Crawford	G	19	1-4	1-4	0-2	5	2	1	0	3
Jake DiMichele	G	16	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
John Hugley IV	F	17	0-2	0-1	2-2	4	1	0	0	2
Dom Aekins	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Brandon Hall	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

77.1Possessions77.1

107.7Offensive Efficiency102.5

102.5Defensive Efficiency107.7

5.2Net Efficiency-5.2

64.5%Effective FG%52.5%

67.3%True Shooting %56.1%

23.8%Turnover Rate26.8%

25.5%Free Throw Rate40.7%

54.5%3-Point Rate49.2%

1.11Assist / Turnover0.62

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 77.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.