Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

58.1%Texas A&M

41.9%Pittsburgh

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -1.6

PROJECTED TOTAL150.3

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -139

Pittsburgh

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 76

Projected Total150.3

Projected ScorePittsburgh 74

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricPittsburgh

58MMH Power Index50.5

116.1Offensive Efficiency108.4

108.4Defensive Efficiency110.4

7.7Net Efficiency-2.0

4.8Strength of Schedule5.5

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9

69.1Tempo65.0

53.5%Effective FG%51.4%

14.8%Turnover Rate17.3%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %33.1%

37.5%Free Throw Rate31.2%

5.3Average Margin-1.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–50.5), offensive efficiency (116.1–108.4), defensive efficiency (108.4–110.4), net efficiency (7.7–-2.0).

Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–4.8), recent form (-6.9–-7.2), offensive rebounding (33.1–31.7).

Final

Texas A&M

81—73

Pittsburgh

Texas A&M by 8 • 64.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATPittsburgh

26-59FG29-61

44.0%FG%48.0%

9-233PT8-26

39.0%3PT%31.0%

20-22FT7-11

91.0%FT%64.0%

36Rebounds32

14Offensive Rebounds12

16Assists13

9Turnovers11

8Steals6

3Blocks4

13Fouls14

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashaun Agee	F	28	7-14	1-1	6-7	13	4	4	2	21
Rubén Dominguez	G	30	5-10	4-8	4-4	2	0	0	0	18
Jacari Lane	G	31	5-8	0-2	4-4	0	5	2	0	14
Rylan Griffen	G	21	2-6	1-3	4-4	3	0	0	0	9
Mackenzie Mgbako	F	20	2-5	2-4	0-0	3	0	0	0	6
Marcus Hill	G	20	1-2	0-1	1-2	0	1	0	0	3
Zach Clemence	F	13	1-5	0-0	1-1	2	1	1	0	3
Pop Isaacs	G	8	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Josh Holloway	G	9	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Federiko Federiko	F	8	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	1	0	2
Ali Dibba	G	9	0-3	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Jamie Vinson	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	1	0

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Barry Dunning Jr.	G	38	9-14	0-1	0-0	12	2	1	2	18
Cameron Corhen	F	39	6-8	0-1	3-4	8	0	0	1	15
Nojus Indrusaitis	G	25	6-14	3-8	0-0	4	1	1	0	15
Damarco Minor	G	34	4-8	4-8	2-2	2	2	1	1	14
Omari Witherspoon	G	32	2-10	1-4	2-3	1	8	2	0	7
Roman Siulepa	F	11	2-5	0-2	0-2	1	0	0	0	4
Brandin Cummings	G	19	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Kieran Mullen	C	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.9Possessions64.9

124.8Offensive Efficiency112.5

112.5Defensive Efficiency124.8

12.3Net Efficiency-12.3

51.7%Effective FG%54.1%

58.3%True Shooting %55.1%

14.0%Turnover Rate16.9%

37.3%Free Throw Rate18.0%

39.0%3-Point Rate42.6%

1.78Assist / Turnover1.18

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 64.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.