Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

30.3%Grambling

69.7%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTulane -5.0

PROJECTED TOTAL144.8

MODEL MONEYLINETulane -230

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 70

Projected Total144.8

Projected ScoreTulane 75

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricTulane

41.4MMH Power Index44.3

100.7Offensive Efficiency105.3

100.4Defensive Efficiency109.9

0.3Net Efficiency-4.6

-5.7Strength of Schedule2.7

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

69.9Tempo68.7

49.2%Effective FG%49.6%

20.9%Turnover Rate15.6%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

42.2%Free Throw Rate44.8%

0.2Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Tulane HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulane holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.3–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.3–100.7), strength of schedule (2.7–-5.7), shooting efficiency (49.6–49.2).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–109.9), net efficiency (0.3–-4.6), recent form (-0.4–-10.3).

Final

Grambling

63—65

Tulane

Tulane by 2 • 61.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATTulane

21-48FG21-54

44.0%FG%39.0%

7-273PT7-22

26.0%3PT%32.0%

14-20FT16-21

70.0%FT%76.0%

33Rebounds30

9Offensive Rebounds11

13Assists12

15Turnovers7

3Steals12

2Blocks5

21Fouls19

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Derrius Ward	G	36	5-10	3-8	5-6	1	2	0	0	18
Randarius Jones	C	33	5-8	0-0	2-4	5	0	0	0	12
Jamil Muttilib	G	15	3-8	2-7	3-4	1	0	0	0	11
Jimel Lane	F	27	3-6	0-2	2-2	8	5	1	0	8
Rickey Ballard	F	28	2-5	2-5	1-2	0	0	1	0	7
Roderick Coffee III	F	39	2-5	0-2	1-2	10	6	1	1	5
Devyn Franklin	G	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	2
P.J. Edwards	G	8	0-3	0-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Antonio Munoz	F	5	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Curtis Williams Jr.	G	39	7-11	2-5	1-2	13	3	4	0	17
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	37	4-11	2-6	7-8	4	2	1	0	17
Asher Woods	G	34	3-11	1-3	6-6	2	2	0	0	13
Josiah Moore	G	22	3-5	0-1	1-2	3	2	4	0	7
KJ Greene	G	9	2-3	2-2	0-0	0	1	1	0	6
Tyler Ringgold	F	16	1-6	0-1	1-3	2	1	1	2	3
Scotty Middleton	F	19	1-7	0-4	0-0	1	1	1	1	2
Percy Daniels	C	24	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	2	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.8Possessions61.8

101.9Offensive Efficiency105.2

105.2Defensive Efficiency101.9

-3.2Net Efficiency3.2

51.0%Effective FG%45.4%

54.8%True Shooting %50.8%

23.6%Turnover Rate11.7%

41.7%Free Throw Rate38.9%

56.3%3-Point Rate40.7%

0.87Assist / Turnover1.71

Game Summary

Tulane won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 61.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.