Utah logo

Utah

10-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.9%Utah
87.1%California
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCalifornia -13.4
PROJECTED TOTAL155.0
MODEL MONEYLINECalifornia -675
California logo

California

22-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUtah 71
Projected Total155.0
Projected ScoreCalifornia 84

Team Comparison

43.9MMH Power Index56.5
108.8Offensive Efficiency111.8
115.8Defensive Efficiency104.8
-7.0Net Efficiency7.0
5.1Strength of Schedule2.8
-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.8
68.3Tempo69.9
52.3%Effective FG%52.6%
16.7%Turnover Rate14.9%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
32.2%Free Throw Rate36.8%
-4.8Average Margin4.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

California HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCalifornia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.5–43.9), offensive efficiency (111.8–108.8), defensive efficiency (104.8–115.8), net efficiency (7.0–-7.0).
Utah COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–2.8), offensive rebounding (28.8–26.6).
Final
Utah logo
Utah
72—79
California logo
California
California by 7 • 68.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UtahTEAM STATCalifornia
25-59FG25-55
42.0%FG%45.0%
8-283PT7-18
29.0%3PT%39.0%
14-19FT22-24
74.0%FT%92.0%
32Rebounds36
10Offensive Rebounds8
15Assists12
10Turnovers10
7Steals4
1Blocks3
19Fouls18

Player Box Score

Utah
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Terrence BrownG315-131-44-612200015
Seydou TraoreF284-91-35-552100014
Keanu DawesF285-90-24-595100014
Jacob PatrickG215-83-60-112100013
Don McHenryG284-122-90-021000010
Kendyl SandersF161-51-30-02000003
James OkonkwoF151-10-00-02000002
Obomate AbbeyG190-20-11-23320001
Josh HayesF140-00-00-02001000
California
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dai Dai AmesG329-140-17-711100025
Justin PippenG308-153-74-432110023
John CamdenF314-73-52-241110013
Lee DortF303-40-02-211301008
Chris BellF240-30-17-93110007
DeJuan CampbellG211-51-20-02200003
Milos IlicC110-30-00-01100000
Nolan DorseyG110-20-10-01100000
Semetri CarrG100-20-10-04000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.2Possessions68.2
105.6Offensive Efficiency115.8
115.8Defensive Efficiency105.6
-10.3Net Efficiency10.3
49.2%Effective FG%51.8%
52.9%True Shooting %59.5%
14.7%Turnover Rate14.6%
32.2%Free Throw Rate43.6%
47.5%3-Point Rate32.7%
1.50Assist / Turnover1.20
Game Summary
California won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 68.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.