Tennessee Tech

13-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.0%Tennessee Tech

72.0%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -7.2

PROJECTED TOTAL151.1

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -257

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTennessee Tech 72

Projected Total151.1

Projected ScoreLipscomb 79

Team Comparison

Tennessee TechMetricLipscomb

44MMH Power Index47.9

105.4Offensive Efficiency111.3

107.0Defensive Efficiency107.6

-1.6Net Efficiency3.7

-3.8Strength of Schedule-2.5

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

69.6Tempo68.8

50.4%Effective FG%54.8%

19.1%Turnover Rate16.0%

32.0%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

37.2%Free Throw Rate26.5%

-1.2Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–44.0), offensive efficiency (111.3–105.4), net efficiency (3.7–-1.6), strength of schedule (-2.5–-3.8).

Tennessee Tech COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.0–107.6), recent form (4.4–-1.0), offensive rebounding (32.0–25.9).

Final

Tennessee Tech

80—83

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 3 • 74.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Tennessee TechTEAM STATLipscomb

29-63FG29-65

46.0%FG%45.0%

10-223PT11-32

45.0%3PT%34.0%

12-17FT14-20

71.0%FT%70.0%

38Rebounds36

10Offensive Rebounds10

11Assists20

12Turnovers11

8Steals9

4Blocks5

17Fouls14

Player Box Score

Tennessee Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dani Pounds	F	23	8-14	1-2	2-2	7	0	2	1	19
Ty Owens	G	35	6-9	1-2	2-2	5	7	2	0	15
Mekhi Cameron	G	31	4-9	3-6	3-4	5	0	1	0	14
Brandon Muntu	G	26	3-10	2-8	0-0	1	0	0	0	8
JaJuan Nicholls	F	14	2-3	0-0	4-7	5	0	0	2	8
Malik Ferguson	G	18	2-4	1-1	1-2	1	0	1	0	6
C.J. McPherson	G	12	2-5	2-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	6
Ja'Quavian Florence	G	22	2-7	0-0	0-0	4	2	1	0	4
Grant Slatten	G	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Owen Varnado	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Jah'Kim Payne	G	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	0
Mekhi Turner	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Grant Asman	F	30	5-10	3-8	4-4	6	2	1	4	17
Titas Sargiunas	F	27	7-11	2-5	0-0	1	2	2	0	16
Ross Candelino	G	21	3-7	3-7	3-6	6	0	0	0	12
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	32	4-9	1-3	1-2	7	7	0	0	10
Charlie Williams	C	19	3-7	1-1	2-2	5	5	0	1	9
Or Ashkenazi	F	20	2-3	1-2	0-1	4	1	2	0	5
Ethan Duncan	G	16	1-4	0-2	2-2	0	0	1	0	4
Kellan Boylan	F	14	1-5	0-0	2-3	1	2	2	0	4
Cole Middleton	F	9	2-5	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Kennedy Okpara	F	12	1-4	0-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

74.3Possessions74.3

107.7Offensive Efficiency111.7

111.7Defensive Efficiency107.7

-4.0Net Efficiency4.0

54.0%Effective FG%53.1%

56.3%True Shooting %55.7%

16.4%Turnover Rate14.6%

27.0%Free Throw Rate30.8%

34.9%3-Point Rate49.2%

0.92Assist / Turnover1.82

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 74.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.