Furman logo

Furman

22-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.5%Furman
39.5%Elon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFurman -1.8
PROJECTED TOTAL153.9
MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -153
Elon logo

Elon

14-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFurman 78
Projected Total153.9
Projected ScoreElon 76

Team Comparison

53.9MMH Power Index45.5
113.3Offensive Efficiency113.0
105.1Defensive Efficiency112.7
8.2Net Efficiency0.3
-1.8Strength of Schedule-1.4
4.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-13.7
67.4Tempo69.1
55.4%Effective FG%52.6%
17.7%Turnover Rate15.6%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %33.4%
32.6%Free Throw Rate34.0%
5.5Average Margin0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Furman HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFurman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.9–45.5), offensive efficiency (113.3–113.0), defensive efficiency (105.1–112.7), net efficiency (8.2–0.3).
Elon COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.4–-1.8), ball security (15.6–17.7), offensive rebounding (33.4–31.7).
Final
Furman logo
Furman
97—88
Elon logo
Elon
Furman by 9 • 71.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

FurmanTEAM STATElon
31-61FG29-68
51.0%FG%43.0%
11-343PT11-34
32.0%3PT%32.0%
24-31FT19-25
77.0%FT%76.0%
41Rebounds38
12Offensive Rebounds14
20Assists16
8Turnovers6
3Steals4
7Blocks4
20Fouls23

Player Box Score

Furman
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Asa ThomasG336-125-114-432000021
Cooper BowserF337-70-05-982030019
Ben Vander WalF316-71-20-182100013
Charles JohnstonF294-132-82-2114010012
Tom HouseG181-41-39-1023000012
Collin O'NealG203-51-22-21322009
Alex WilkinsG243-120-72-30301008
Eddrin BronsonG121-11-10-02100003
Elon
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chandler CuthrellF288-142-37-971100025
Randall Pettus IIG305-105-96-711100021
Ja'Juan CarrG295-70-12-356100012
Bryson CokleyG244-131-62-251010011
Kacper KlaczekF273-91-50-22212007
Isaac HarrellF262-71-40-03100005
Ned HullG91-51-50-03000003
DeMarco JohnsonG150-10-12-24300002
Bryson SpellF121-20-00-01101002

Advanced Game Stats

71.8Possessions71.8
135.1Offensive Efficiency122.6
122.6Defensive Efficiency135.1
12.5Net Efficiency-12.5
59.8%Effective FG%50.7%
64.0%True Shooting %55.1%
11.2%Turnover Rate8.3%
50.8%Free Throw Rate36.8%
55.7%3-Point Rate50.0%
2.50Assist / Turnover2.67
Game Summary
Furman won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 71.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.