Gardner-Webb

4-29

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.5%Gardner-Webb

96.5%Queens University

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQueens University -22.1

PROJECTED TOTAL165.5

MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -2757

Queens University

21-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 72

Projected Total165.5

Projected ScoreQueens University 94

Team Comparison

Gardner-WebbMetricQueens University

26.6MMH Power Index51.7

96.0Offensive Efficiency118.4

120.4Defensive Efficiency117.0

-24.4Net Efficiency1.4

3.3Strength of Schedule0.1

-18.2Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5

71.0Tempo71.4

48.8%Effective FG%56.6%

19.2%Turnover Rate14.8%

23.6%Offensive Rebound %29.6%

31.5%Free Throw Rate37.6%

-17.3Average Margin0.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–26.6), offensive efficiency (118.4–96.0), defensive efficiency (117.0–120.4), net efficiency (1.4–-24.4).

Gardner-Webb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.3–0.1).

Final

Gardner-Webb

74—107

Queens University

Queens University by 33 • 73.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Gardner-WebbTEAM STATQueens University

25-71FG41-67

35.0%FG%61.0%

8-243PT15-29

33.0%3PT%52.0%

16-18FT10-17

89.0%FT%59.0%

39Rebounds38

18Offensive Rebounds9

7Assists23

10Turnovers9

5Steals5

2Blocks4

15Fouls13

Player Box Score

Gardner-Webb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ace Talbert	G	28	4-12	3-8	4-5	5	0	0	0	15
Jacob Hogarth	F	24	7-12	0-0	1-1	8	1	0	0	15
Spence Sims	G	24	6-9	3-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	15
Curtis Williams III	G	29	4-13	1-6	4-4	7	0	0	0	13
Jamias Ferere	G	17	1-5	0-0	4-4	5	1	0	0	6
Colin Hawkins	G	23	2-9	0-2	1-1	1	2	3	0	5
NaVuan Peterson	F	11	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Jacob Hudson	G	27	0-4	0-1	2-2	3	3	1	1	2
Riek Riek	F	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Ahmadou Ndiaye	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-1	3	0	0	1	0
Cameron Gales	G	2	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Queens University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nasir Mann	G	26	8-12	3-5	1-3	6	2	0	0	20
Avantae Parker	F	18	9-11	0-1	0-2	5	1	2	2	18
Chris Ashby	G	25	5-10	4-8	0-0	1	1	0	0	14
Carson Schwieger	F	20	4-5	4-5	0-0	2	1	1	0	12
Maban Jabriel	F	22	4-7	1-3	2-2	5	2	1	0	11
Gus Larson	F	18	3-4	0-0	3-4	6	1	0	2	9
Isaiah Henry	G	15	4-6	1-1	0-0	3	2	0	0	9
Jordan Watford	G	22	2-3	0-0	3-4	1	9	0	0	7
Yoav Berman	G	19	1-6	1-3	1-2	3	2	1	0	4
Kam Clark	F	11	1-2	1-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	3
Reid Celestin	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Tyler Crider	G	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.4Possessions73.4

100.8Offensive Efficiency145.8

145.8Defensive Efficiency100.8

-45.0Net Efficiency45.0

40.8%Effective FG%72.4%

46.5%True Shooting %71.3%

14.0%Turnover Rate12.0%

25.4%Free Throw Rate25.4%

33.8%3-Point Rate43.3%

0.70Assist / Turnover2.56

Game Summary

Queens University won by 33 points. The game played at approximately 73.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.