Austin Peay

22-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

37.8%Austin Peay

62.2%Kent State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADKent State -3.5

PROJECTED TOTAL163.7

MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -165

Kent State

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAustin Peay 80

Projected Total163.7

Projected ScoreKent State 84

Team Comparison

Austin PeayMetricKent State

54.8MMH Power Index54.7

115.0Offensive Efficiency113.9

103.1Defensive Efficiency107.6

11.9Net Efficiency6.3

-5.8Strength of Schedule-0.1

8.1Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1

71.0Tempo74.0

53.9%Effective FG%53.0%

15.3%Turnover Rate17.7%

30.3%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

39.0%Free Throw Rate43.5%

8.4Average Margin4.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Austin Peay HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAustin Peay holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.8–54.7), offensive efficiency (115.0–113.9), defensive efficiency (103.1–107.6), net efficiency (11.9–6.3).

Kent State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.1–-5.8), offensive rebounding (35.0–30.3), free throw rate (43.5–39.0).

Final

Austin Peay

84—96

Kent State

Kent State by 12 • 73.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Austin PeayTEAM STATKent State

30-66FG30-51

45.0%FG%59.0%

13-313PT13-24

42.0%3PT%54.0%

11-16FT23-32

69.0%FT%72.0%

31Rebounds32

11Offensive Rebounds6

22Assists15

11Turnovers13

5Steals6

3Blocks7

22Fouls18

Player Box Score

Austin Peay

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Collin Parker	F	34	9-18	7-10	4-4	4	6	0	2	29
Rashaud Marshall	F	33	10-16	0-0	3-6	7	3	0	1	23
Zyree Collins	PG	32	5-12	2-7	4-6	2	9	1	0	16
Tate McCubbin	G	29	4-8	3-7	0-0	4	1	1	0	11
Creighton Morisch	F	4	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Hansel Enmanuel	PG	9	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Quan Lax	PG	19	0-3	0-2	0-0	3	1	1	0	0
Anton Brookshire	PG	18	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Matt Enright	PG	14	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	1	0	0
Tyler Wagner	G	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Kent State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Delrecco Gillespie	F	34	8-15	4-6	2-2	10	2	2	4	22
Jahari Williamson	G	25	6-7	6-7	0-0	1	0	1	0	18
Cian Medley	G	33	4-5	1-2	8-10	2	8	0	0	17
Rob Whaley Jr.	F	25	7-10	0-1	1-5	3	1	0	1	15
Morgan Safford	G	31	1-7	1-5	6-8	3	1	0	1	9
Rayvon Griffith	F	22	2-4	0-1	4-5	3	1	3	1	8
Magnus Entenmann	F	7	1-2	0-1	2-2	1	1	0	0	4
Quinn Woidke	G	15	1-1	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Omer Hamama	G	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.4Possessions73.4

114.4Offensive Efficiency130.8

130.8Defensive Efficiency114.4

-16.3Net Efficiency16.3

55.3%Effective FG%71.6%

57.1%True Shooting %72.5%

14.9%Turnover Rate17.8%

24.2%Free Throw Rate62.7%

47.0%3-Point Rate47.1%

2.00Assist / Turnover1.15

Game Summary

Kent State won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 73.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.