
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.8%Hofstra
42.2%Columbia
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -0.6
PROJECTED TOTAL146.2
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -137

Columbia
16-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 73
Projected Total146.2
Projected ScoreColumbia 73
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index51.9
114.0Offensive Efficiency112.4
100.9Defensive Efficiency105.2
13.1Net Efficiency7.2
-2.9Strength of Schedule-1.7
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.4
66.2Tempo68.2
52.2%Effective FG%54.4%
16.1%Turnover Rate19.1%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %37.3%
32.0%Free Throw Rate28.8%
8.7Average Margin5.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–51.9), offensive efficiency (114.0–112.4), defensive efficiency (100.9–105.2), net efficiency (13.1–7.2).
Columbia COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.7–-2.9), shooting efficiency (54.4–52.2), offensive rebounding (37.3–35.0).