UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

27.1%UT Rio Grande Valley

72.9%Stephen F. Austin

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADStephen F. Austin -7.5

PROJECTED TOTAL144.9

MODEL MONEYLINEStephen F. Austin -269

Stephen F. Austin

28-6

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 69

Projected Total144.9

Projected ScoreStephen F. Austin 76

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricStephen F. Austin

55.8MMH Power Index60.1

112.6Offensive Efficiency114.3

103.1Defensive Efficiency99.4

9.5Net Efficiency14.9

-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.8

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.7

67.4Tempo67.0

55.7%Effective FG%52.2%

17.9%Turnover Rate13.9%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %34.3%

29.6%Free Throw Rate30.3%

6.4Average Margin10.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Stephen F. Austin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStephen F. Austin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.1–55.8), offensive efficiency (114.3–112.6), defensive efficiency (99.4–103.1), net efficiency (14.9–9.5).

UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHrecent form (12.3–4.7), shooting efficiency (55.7–52.2).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

60—73

Stephen F. Austin

Stephen F. Austin by 13 • 68.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATStephen F. Austin

22-62FG24-62

35.0%FG%39.0%

4-163PT8-24

25.0%3PT%33.0%

12-16FT17-24

75.0%FT%71.0%

40Rebounds44

10Offensive Rebounds11

9Assists12

8Turnovers7

4Steals5

5Blocks6

18Fouls19

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaylen Washington	G	25	7-9	1-2	0-0	7	0	0	0	15
Koree Cotton	G	30	3-12	0-1	5-6	8	3	0	2	11
Julien Gomez	G	20	2-5	0-0	4-4	2	1	0	0	8
Dane Christensen	F	15	2-5	1-4	2-4	0	1	0	0	7
Zae Blake	G	29	2-5	0-3	1-2	0	1	3	1	5
Marvin McGhee III	G	27	2-11	1-3	0-0	8	1	0	0	5
Always Wright	G	19	2-3	0-1	0-0	2	2	1	0	4
Kwo Agwa	F	12	1-6	1-1	0-0	6	0	0	2	3
Filip Brankovic	F	20	1-6	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Demarris Winters	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Stephen F. Austin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Narit Chotikavanic	G	22	3-6	3-5	4-6	3	0	1	0	13
Lateef Patrick	G	36	4-17	0-7	4-6	6	2	2	0	12
Chrishawn Christmas	G	31	4-7	0-1	3-3	10	0	0	0	11
Ahamed Mohammed	G	19	4-7	2-4	1-3	2	1	0	0	11
Keon Thompson	G	27	2-6	0-2	5-6	7	6	0	0	9
Kam Burton	G	16	3-7	3-4	0-0	2	0	1	0	9
Jerald Colonel	F	27	3-5	0-0	0-0	8	0	1	6	6
Marcus Scurry	G	10	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Gediminas Alisas	F	12	0-4	0-0	0-0	2	3	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.5Possessions68.5

87.6Offensive Efficiency106.6

106.6Defensive Efficiency87.6

-19.0Net Efficiency19.0

38.7%Effective FG%45.2%

43.1%True Shooting %49.7%

11.8%Turnover Rate10.1%

25.8%Free Throw Rate38.7%

25.8%3-Point Rate38.7%

1.13Assist / Turnover1.71

Game Summary

Stephen F. Austin won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 68.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.