
Mississippi Valley State
3-30GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.1%Mississippi Valley State
87.9%UL Monroe
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUL Monroe -13.2
PROJECTED TOTAL154.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUL Monroe -726

UL Monroe
4-28MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 71
Projected Total154.3
Projected ScoreUL Monroe 84
Team Comparison
17.7MMH Power Index30.9
91.1Offensive Efficiency101.1
117.8Defensive Efficiency117.1
-26.7Net Efficiency-16.0
-4.1Strength of Schedule-1.0
-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.2
70.5Tempo71.7
45.8%Effective FG%48.1%
21.8%Turnover Rate16.9%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %25.3%
34.5%Free Throw Rate40.6%
-18.8Average Margin-11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UL Monroe HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUL Monroe holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (30.9–17.7), offensive efficiency (101.1–91.1), defensive efficiency (117.1–117.8), net efficiency (-16.0–-26.7).
Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (26.5–25.3).