Tennessee State

23-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

72.1%Tennessee State

27.9%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTennessee State -5.2

PROJECTED TOTAL151.5

MODEL MONEYLINETennessee State -258

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTennessee State 78

Projected Total151.5

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 73

Team Comparison

Tennessee StateMetricAlabama A&M

55.4MMH Power Index42.3

110.9Offensive Efficiency105.9

102.7Defensive Efficiency106.6

8.2Net Efficiency-0.7

-3.1Strength of Schedule-6.8

13.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

72.4Tempo68.0

50.9%Effective FG%49.7%

17.0%Turnover Rate16.8%

34.8%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

34.7%Free Throw Rate45.7%

5.9Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Tennessee State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.4–42.3), offensive efficiency (110.9–105.9), defensive efficiency (102.7–106.6), net efficiency (8.2–-0.7).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–17.0), free throw rate (45.7–34.7).

Final

Tennessee State

53—80

Alabama A&M

Alabama A&M by 27 • 65.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Tennessee StateTEAM STATAlabama A&M

19-65FG26-51

29.0%FG%51.0%

4-233PT8-17

17.0%3PT%47.0%

11-20FT20-27

55.0%FT%74.0%

42Rebounds40

25Offensive Rebounds12

7Assists11

14Turnovers15

11Steals6

2Blocks7

21Fouls18

Player Box Score

Tennessee State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalen Pitre	F	22	2-4	0-1	7-8	8	2	1	0	11
Dante Harris	G	33	5-10	0-2	0-2	2	1	2	0	10
Aaron Nkrumah	G	28	4-13	1-5	1-3	5	0	4	1	10
Khalil London	G	21	4-12	2-6	0-0	2	0	1	0	10
Travis Harper II	G	29	2-8	1-4	2-4	3	1	2	1	7
Antoine Lorick III	F	16	1-5	0-1	1-3	4	0	0	0	3
Kavien Jones	F	18	1-4	0-0	0-0	7	0	0	0	2
Carlous Williams	F	17	0-5	0-1	0-0	3	3	1	0	0
Jabrion Spikes	G	12	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Damon Howard Jr.	G	4	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Sami Pissis	G	36	7-12	4-8	3-4	1	7	2	0	21
Kintavious Dozier	G	33	4-7	1-3	9-9	7	1	2	1	18
James Graham III	G	32	7-9	3-3	0-0	4	1	0	0	17
Koron Davis	G	34	4-10	0-1	6-8	9	0	1	1	14
PJ Eason	F	33	4-7	0-0	2-6	14	1	1	5	10
Peyton Daniels Sr.	G	11	0-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Lou Hutchinson	G	9	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Gabe Kincy	G	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Angok Anyang	F	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
James Flippin	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.2Possessions65.2

81.3Offensive Efficiency122.7

122.7Defensive Efficiency81.3

-41.4Net Efficiency41.4

32.3%Effective FG%58.8%

35.6%True Shooting %62.7%

22.0%Turnover Rate22.4%

30.8%Free Throw Rate52.9%

35.4%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.50Assist / Turnover0.73

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 27 points. The game played at approximately 65.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.