UMBC

24-8

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

58.4%UMBC

41.6%Georgetown

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUMBC -1.4

PROJECTED TOTAL134.2

MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -140

Georgetown

13-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUMBC 68

Projected Total134.2

Projected ScoreGeorgetown 66

Team Comparison

UMBCMetricGeorgetown

59.1MMH Power Index51.5

113.0Offensive Efficiency107.2

99.0Defensive Efficiency107.4

14.0Net Efficiency-0.2

-5.6Strength of Schedule4.4

24.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.8

65.5Tempo61.7

54.3%Effective FG%49.2%

14.3%Turnover Rate16.4%

25.2%Offensive Rebound %32.3%

34.1%Free Throw Rate38.3%

9.1Average Margin-0.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–51.5), offensive efficiency (113.0–107.2), defensive efficiency (99.0–107.4), net efficiency (14.0–-0.2).

Georgetown COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.4–-5.6), offensive rebounding (32.3–25.2), free throw rate (38.3–34.1).

Final

UMBC

0—0

Georgetown

Tied • 0.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UMBCTEAM STATGeorgetown

null-nullFGnull-null

0.0%FG%0.0%

null-null3PTnull-null

0.0%3PT%0.0%

null-nullFTnull-null

0.0%FT%0.0%

—Rebounds—

—Offensive Rebounds—

—Assists—

—Turnovers—

—Steals—

—Blocks—

—Fouls—

Advanced Game Stats

0.0Possessions0.0

0.0Offensive Efficiency0.0

0.0Defensive Efficiency0.0

0.0Net Efficiency0.0

0.0%Effective FG%0.0%

0.0%True Shooting %0.0%

0.0%Turnover Rate0.0%

0.0%Free Throw Rate0.0%

0.0%3-Point Rate0.0%

0.00Assist / Turnover0.00

Game Summary

Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 0.0 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.