SMU

20-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

22.8%SMU

77.2%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -8.9

PROJECTED TOTAL166.1

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -339

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSMU 79

Projected Total166.1

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 87

Team Comparison

SMUMetricVanderbilt

62.5MMH Power Index68.9

118.2Offensive Efficiency120.9

109.6Defensive Efficiency105.7

8.6Net Efficiency15.2

7.0Strength of Schedule7.4

-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

71.1Tempo70.9

55.7%Effective FG%55.3%

15.7%Turnover Rate13.5%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

31.3%Free Throw Rate39.3%

6.1Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–62.5), offensive efficiency (120.9–118.2), defensive efficiency (105.7–109.6), net efficiency (15.2–8.6).

SMU COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (55.7–55.3), offensive rebounding (35.0–30.8).

Final

SMU

69—88

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 19 • 67.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SMUTEAM STATVanderbilt

25-60FG36-63

42.0%FG%57.0%

2-173PT6-24

12.0%3PT%25.0%

17-23FT10-12

74.0%FT%83.0%

38Rebounds30

16Offensive Rebounds6

12Assists20

13Turnovers5

2Steals7

—Blocks8

14Fouls21

Player Box Score

SMU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Boopie Miller	G	38	5-13	0-3	7-8	7	6	1	17
Samet Yigitoglu	C	34	7-10	0-0	2-4	8	0	0	16
Jaron Pierre Jr.	G	33	5-13	2-7	1-3	4	0	0	13
B.J. Edwards	G	34	4-14	0-6	2-2	6	2	0	10
Corey Washington	F	29	1-3	0-0	4-4	4	2	1	6
Jaden Toombs	C	16	2-6	0-1	1-2	2	2	0	5
B.J. Davis-Ray	G	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.	F	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Tanner	G	37	10-14	2-5	4-4	5	6	2	1	26
Devin McGlockton	F	26	6-7	1-1	0-0	8	2	0	1	13
Tyler Nickel	F	24	5-8	2-5	0-0	1	2	2	1	12
Duke Miles	G	29	4-11	0-4	2-2	2	2	1	1	10
AK Okereke	F	28	4-5	1-2	0-0	3	4	1	0	9
Jalen Washington	C	18	3-6	0-3	2-3	6	2	1	4	8
Frankie Collins	G	16	1-4	0-1	2-3	2	1	0	0	4
Tyler Harris	F	10	2-6	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	4
Chandler Bing	G	7	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Mason Nicholson	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jayden Leverett	C	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jaylon Dean-Vines	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Coleson Messer	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Miles Keeffe	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.8Possessions67.8

101.8Offensive Efficiency129.8

129.8Defensive Efficiency101.8

-28.0Net Efficiency28.0

43.3%Effective FG%61.9%

48.6%True Shooting %64.0%

19.1%Turnover Rate7.4%

38.3%Free Throw Rate19.0%

28.3%3-Point Rate38.1%

0.92Assist / Turnover4.00

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 67.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.