Quinnipiac

19-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

48.7%Quinnipiac

51.3%Iona

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADIona -1.1

PROJECTED TOTAL148.4

MODEL MONEYLINEIona -105

Iona

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 74

Projected Total148.4

Projected ScoreIona 75

Team Comparison

QuinnipiacMetricIona

51MMH Power Index46.9

106.8Offensive Efficiency105.8

102.1Defensive Efficiency104.8

4.7Net Efficiency1.0

-2.3Strength of Schedule-1.6

2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5

70.5Tempo69.8

48.9%Effective FG%51.9%

15.6%Turnover Rate17.2%

34.1%Offensive Rebound %27.4%

34.1%Free Throw Rate29.9%

3.4Average Margin0.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–46.9), offensive efficiency (106.8–105.8), defensive efficiency (102.1–104.8), net efficiency (4.7–1.0).

Iona COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.6–-2.3), shooting efficiency (51.9–48.9).

Final

Quinnipiac

89—68

Iona

Quinnipiac by 21 • 73.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

QuinnipiacTEAM STATIona

35-73FG24-65

48.0%FG%37.0%

9-263PT5-23

35.0%3PT%22.0%

10-14FT15-22

71.0%FT%68.0%

49Rebounds35

18Offensive Rebounds15

23Assists15

12Turnovers12

8Steals6

3Blocks3

18Fouls12

Player Box Score

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaden Zimmerman	G	39	7-16	1-6	4-7	6	5	3	1	19
Grant Randall	F	35	5-10	1-4	2-2	10	2	0	1	13
Asim Jones	G	17	6-8	1-1	0-0	4	6	1	0	13
Amarri Monroe	F	29	5-10	1-4	0-0	7	5	1	0	11
Nate Guerengomba	G	21	4-10	1-2	2-2	4	0	1	1	11
Keith McKnight	G	19	4-9	0-1	2-3	7	1	2	0	10
Tai Turnage	G	16	2-6	2-4	0-0	1	2	0	0	6
Samson Reilly	G	8	2-4	2-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Spence Wewe	F	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Sam Nosakhare	F	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0

Iona

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Lamin Sabally	F	36	10-14	0-0	7-13	14	1	2	0	27
CJ Anthony	G	28	4-14	2-7	0-0	2	7	0	0	10
Keshawn Williams	G	26	4-8	0-2	2-2	5	1	0	0	10
Kosy Akametu	G	31	2-12	1-4	4-4	5	4	1	1	9
Denver Anglin	G	26	3-9	2-6	0-0	0	1	2	0	8
Toby Harris	F	19	0-3	0-3	2-2	3	0	1	0	2
Alliou Fall	F	9	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Khalil Badru	G	17	0-3	0-1	0-1	4	1	0	2	0
Luke Jungers	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Chase Cormier	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.1Possessions73.1

121.8Offensive Efficiency93.0

93.0Defensive Efficiency121.8

28.7Net Efficiency-28.7

54.1%Effective FG%40.8%

55.9%True Shooting %45.1%

16.3%Turnover Rate16.6%

19.2%Free Throw Rate33.8%

35.6%3-Point Rate35.4%

1.92Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 73.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.