UAB

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

65.9%UAB

34.1%Drake

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -3.0

PROJECTED TOTAL153.9

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -193

Drake

14-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 78

Projected Total153.9

Projected ScoreDrake 75

Team Comparison

UABMetricDrake

56.9MMH Power Index46.4

110.5Offensive Efficiency109.5

102.9Defensive Efficiency109.1

7.6Net Efficiency0.4

0.4Strength of Schedule0.3

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.3

71.7Tempo68.6

48.8%Effective FG%52.2%

12.4%Turnover Rate14.9%

32.7%Offensive Rebound %27.2%

36.9%Free Throw Rate34.4%

5.4Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY65.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–46.4), offensive efficiency (110.5–109.5), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.1), net efficiency (7.6–0.4).

Drake COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.2–48.8).

Final

UAB

74—69

Drake

UAB by 5 • 68.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATDrake

25-57FG24-62

44.0%FG%39.0%

3-143PT9-24

21.0%3PT%38.0%

21-28FT12-16

75.0%FT%75.0%

44Rebounds30

13Offensive Rebounds9

7Assists11

11Turnovers8

5Steals8

9Blocks4

14Fouls19

Player Box Score

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chance Westry	G	25	6-11	1-3	4-5	1	2	0	2	17
Ahmad Robinson	G	35	6-13	2-6	2-2	3	1	1	0	16
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	F	24	6-11	0-0	2-2	11	0	0	3	14
Jacob Meyer	G	31	2-10	0-3	4-4	5	2	0	0	8
Daniel Rivera	F	28	3-7	0-0	2-5	6	0	0	2	8
Evan Chatman	F	28	1-3	0-2	5-7	15	0	2	2	7
Ari Gooch	G	9	1-1	0-0	2-3	1	0	2	0	4
Salim London	G	15	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Dayjaun Anderson	G	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Drake

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalen Quinn	G	39	7-18	3-6	9-10	6	1	3	0	26
Eli Shetlar	G	19	3-5	2-4	0-0	2	2	1	0	8
Isaiah Carr	F	13	4-5	0-0	0-0	5	2	0	3	8
Okku Federiko	F	21	3-5	0-0	0-2	5	1	1	0	6
Jaehshon Thomas	G	17	2-8	1-4	1-1	1	2	0	0	6
Wilguens Jr. Exacte	F	18	2-6	0-1	0-1	4	1	1	0	4
Andrew Alia	G	30	1-2	1-1	0-0	2	1	2	1	3
Braden Appelhans	G	23	1-6	1-5	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Owen Larson	G	11	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Griffen Goodbary	F	9	0-3	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

68.4Possessions68.4

108.2Offensive Efficiency100.9

100.9Defensive Efficiency108.2

7.3Net Efficiency-7.3

46.5%Effective FG%46.0%

52.6%True Shooting %49.6%

16.1%Turnover Rate11.7%

49.1%Free Throw Rate25.8%

24.6%3-Point Rate38.7%

0.64Assist / Turnover1.38

Game Summary

UAB won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 68.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.