Notre Dame

13-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

16.5%Notre Dame

83.5%TCU

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTCU -11.2

PROJECTED TOTAL152.1

MODEL MONEYLINETCU -506

TCU

23-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 70

Projected Total152.1

Projected ScoreTCU 82

Team Comparison

Notre DameMetricTCU

49.7MMH Power Index59.7

110.3Offensive Efficiency110.2

111.2Defensive Efficiency102.7

-0.9Net Efficiency7.5

4.7Strength of Schedule4.6

-11.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

68.0Tempo70.2

53.0%Effective FG%50.5%

17.0%Turnover Rate15.3%

31.4%Offensive Rebound %33.6%

34.7%Free Throw Rate38.3%

-0.6Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

TCU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–49.7), defensive efficiency (102.7–111.2), net efficiency (7.5–-0.9), recent form (2.2–-11.6).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.3–110.2), strength of schedule (4.7–4.6), shooting efficiency (53.0–50.5).

Final

Notre Dame

87—85

TCU

Notre Dame by 2 • 74.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Notre DameTEAM STATTCU

33-60FG29-60

55.0%FG%48.0%

12-263PT12-29

46.0%3PT%41.0%

9-20FT15-23

45.0%FT%65.0%

36Rebounds28

8Offensive Rebounds5

27Assists20

14Turnovers8

2Steals6

2Blocks1

20Fouls18

Player Box Score

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalen Haralson	F	38	8-12	0-1	4-7	5	9	0	1	20
Cole Certa	G	33	6-14	6-12	2-2	2	1	0	0	20
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	38	5-10	3-7	2-4	5	4	0	0	15
Carson Towt	F	33	6-6	0-0	1-5	9	4	1	0	13
Garrett Sundra	F	23	2-2	2-2	0-0	5	2	0	0	6
Markus Burton	G	10	3-6	0-1	0-0	0	5	1	0	6
Brady Koehler	F	13	2-5	0-1	0-2	4	1	0	0	4
Logan Imes	G	15	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Kebba Njie	F	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Sir Mohammed	G	10	0-3	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	1	0
Ryder Frost	F	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

TCU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
David Punch	F	38	6-11	1-3	7-10	7	1	1	1	20
Jayden Pierre	G	39	6-12	4-7	1-2	2	2	1	0	17
Micah Robinson	F	31	3-7	2-4	5-8	4	2	4	0	13
Brock Harding	G	36	5-10	2-5	0-0	2	8	0	0	12
Liutauras Lelevicius	G	24	3-7	1-5	0-0	5	2	0	0	7
Jace Posey	G	19	2-5	0-1	2-2	0	1	0	0	6
Tanner Toolson	G	19	2-5	1-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	5
Xavier Edmonds	F	18	2-3	1-2	0-1	3	3	0	0	5
Vianney Salatchoum	C	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

74.7Possessions74.7

116.5Offensive Efficiency113.8

113.8Defensive Efficiency116.5

2.7Net Efficiency-2.7

65.0%Effective FG%58.3%

62.6%True Shooting %59.9%

18.5%Turnover Rate10.8%

33.3%Free Throw Rate38.3%

43.3%3-Point Rate48.3%

1.93Assist / Turnover2.50

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 74.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Effective FG%, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.