UMBC logo

UMBC

24-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
89.1%UMBC
10.9%Bucknell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUMBC -12.4
PROJECTED TOTAL141.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -817
Bucknell logo

Bucknell

10-23
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUMBC 77
Projected Total141.2
Projected ScoreBucknell 64

Team Comparison

59.1MMH Power Index35.7
113.0Offensive Efficiency99.5
99.0Defensive Efficiency112.8
14.0Net Efficiency-13.3
-5.6Strength of Schedule2.0
24.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5
65.5Tempo67.7
54.3%Effective FG%48.4%
14.3%Turnover Rate19.0%
25.2%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
34.1%Free Throw Rate30.7%
9.1Average Margin-8.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–35.7), offensive efficiency (113.0–99.5), defensive efficiency (99.0–112.8), net efficiency (14.0–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-5.6), offensive rebounding (26.6–25.2).
Final
UMBC logo
UMBC
73—66
Bucknell logo
Bucknell
UMBC by 7 • 64.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UMBCTEAM STATBucknell
27-52FG24-61
52.0%FG%39.0%
7-183PT6-24
39.0%3PT%25.0%
12-15FT12-17
80.0%FT%71.0%
32Rebounds34
6Offensive Rebounds14
18Assists14
12Turnovers9
3Steals8
8Blocks3
14Fouls16

Player Box Score

UMBC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jah'Likai KingG326-112-56-722010020
Josh OdunowoF316-110-00-072120012
DJ Armstrong Jr.G324-82-51-255000011
Riley JacobsF284-70-13-450230011
Ace ValentineG243-43-30-02500009
Caden DiggsF252-60-22-23002006
Cougar DowningG91-20-10-01100002
Jose Roberto TanchynF61-30-10-01000002
Daylon DickersonF120-00-00-04300000
Tim EzeF10-00-00-00000000
Bucknell
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Amon DörriesC345-80-16-642100016
Grgur BrcicC306-110-02-6161010014
Achile SpadoneG325-123-70-023110013
Quin BergerG343-103-82-210410011
Jayden WilliamsG342-80-32-23520006
Aleksander PachuckiG221-70-40-04100002
Jacob MeachemG111-30-10-10200002
Patrick O'BrienF31-20-00-01000002

Advanced Game Stats

64.6Possessions64.6
113.0Offensive Efficiency102.2
102.2Defensive Efficiency113.0
10.8Net Efficiency-10.8
58.7%Effective FG%44.3%
61.7%True Shooting %47.8%
18.4%Turnover Rate14.0%
28.8%Free Throw Rate27.9%
34.6%3-Point Rate39.3%
1.50Assist / Turnover1.56
Game Summary
UMBC won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 64.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.