
Utah Valley
25-9GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.5%Utah Valley
50.5%Bowling Green
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBowling Green -1.2
PROJECTED TOTAL153.0
MODEL MONEYLINEBowling Green -102

Bowling Green
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUtah Valley 76
Projected Total153.0
Projected ScoreBowling Green 77
Team Comparison
59.1MMH Power Index54.7
113.4Offensive Efficiency112.6
97.3Defensive Efficiency99.1
16.1Net Efficiency13.5
-3.3Strength of Schedule-4.7
6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
70.6Tempo72.2
56.0%Effective FG%53.4%
19.9%Turnover Rate15.9%
36.2%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
37.3%Free Throw Rate38.7%
11.4Average Margin9.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–54.7), offensive efficiency (113.4–112.6), defensive efficiency (97.3–99.1), net efficiency (16.1–13.5).
Bowling Green COUNTERS WITHball security (15.9–19.9), free throw rate (38.7–37.3).