
Harvard
17-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
34.2%Harvard
65.8%Furman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFurman -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL141.9
MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -192

Furman
22-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 68
Projected Total141.9
Projected ScoreFurman 74
Team Comparison
52.6MMH Power Index53.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency113.3
102.9Defensive Efficiency105.1
5.2Net Efficiency8.2
-0.1Strength of Schedule-1.8
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.6
64.8Tempo67.4
53.4%Effective FG%55.4%
17.2%Turnover Rate17.7%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
27.9%Free Throw Rate32.6%
3.4Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Furman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY65.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFurman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.9–52.6), offensive efficiency (113.3–108.1), net efficiency (8.2–5.2), shooting efficiency (55.4–53.4).
Harvard COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–105.1), strength of schedule (-0.1–-1.8), recent form (8.3–4.6).