Boston University

16-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

78.7%Boston University

21.3%New Hampshire

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBoston University -6.0

PROJECTED TOTAL148.0

MODEL MONEYLINEBoston University -369

New Hampshire

9-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBoston University 77

Projected Total148.0

Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 71

Team Comparison

Boston UniversityMetricNew Hampshire

50.3MMH Power Index34

115.3Offensive Efficiency99.6

113.1Defensive Efficiency107.5

2.2Net Efficiency-7.9

-2.7Strength of Schedule-3.4

11.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6

65.4Tempo69.4

58.6%Effective FG%47.6%

17.7%Turnover Rate16.1%

27.4%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

32.2%Free Throw Rate29.4%

1.5Average Margin-5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Boston University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBoston University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–34.0), offensive efficiency (115.3–99.6), net efficiency (2.2–-7.9), strength of schedule (-2.7–-3.4).

New Hampshire COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.5–113.1), ball security (16.1–17.7).

Final

Boston University

82—88

New Hampshire

New Hampshire by 6 • 76.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Boston UniversityTEAM STATNew Hampshire

27-62FG33-65

44.0%FG%51.0%

13-273PT7-23

48.0%3PT%30.0%

15-27FT15-29

56.0%FT%52.0%

37Rebounds46

10Offensive Rebounds13

12Assists5

13Turnovers10

4Steals5

4Blocks4

20Fouls19

Player Box Score

Boston University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael McNair	G	42	6-11	4-6	5-8	8	2	0	0	21
Sam Hughes	F	38	5-11	5-10	0-0	3	2	1	0	15
Azmar Abdullah	G	26	4-6	1-3	3-4	0	1	1	0	12
Donte Tisinger Jr.	G	17	3-10	3-6	2-6	3	1	1	0	11
Malcolm Chimezie	F	30	3-6	0-0	4-6	8	1	0	1	10
Ben Defty	F	20	4-8	0-0	1-1	3	2	0	2	9
Ben Roy	G	35	2-8	0-2	0-2	5	2	1	1	4
Chance Gladden	G	8	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Quinn Nielsen	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Andrew Bhesania	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

New Hampshire

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
KiJan Robinson	G	32	8-12	4-6	1-3	2	0	1	0	21
Belal El Shakery	F	30	7-14	0-1	4-8	14	1	1	2	18
Jack Graham	G	35	4-9	1-6	4-7	4	3	1	1	13
R.J. Kennedy	G	28	5-9	0-3	2-5	4	0	1	0	12
Tyler Bike	G	15	3-5	2-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	8
Comeh Emuobor	G	18	3-9	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
John Squire	F	20	1-3	0-1	2-4	6	0	0	1	4
Jon O'Neill	F	10	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	4
Davide Poser	F	33	0-2	0-2	2-2	6	1	1	0	2
Giannos Xanthopoulos	C	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

76.8Possessions76.8

106.8Offensive Efficiency114.6

114.6Defensive Efficiency106.8

-7.8Net Efficiency7.8

54.0%Effective FG%56.2%

54.8%True Shooting %55.9%

16.7%Turnover Rate13.2%

43.5%Free Throw Rate44.6%

43.5%3-Point Rate35.4%

0.92Assist / Turnover0.50

Game Summary

New Hampshire won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 76.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.