
UC Riverside
10-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.0%UC Riverside
75.0%Cal Poly
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCal Poly -7.4
PROJECTED TOTAL163.0
MODEL MONEYLINECal Poly -300

Cal Poly
14-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUC Riverside 78
Projected Total163.0
Projected ScoreCal Poly 85
Team Comparison
41.2MMH Power Index46.5
103.1Offensive Efficiency107.2
110.1Defensive Efficiency111.0
-7.0Net Efficiency-3.8
0.5Strength of Schedule1.7
-5.1Last 10 Net Efficiency2.4
70.7Tempo76.6
49.8%Effective FG%52.2%
18.5%Turnover Rate19.8%
28.5%Offensive Rebound %29.9%
35.2%Free Throw Rate35.8%
-4.9Average Margin-2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cal Poly HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCal Poly holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.5–41.2), offensive efficiency (107.2–103.1), net efficiency (-3.8–-7.0), strength of schedule (1.7–0.5).
UC Riverside COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (110.1–111.0), ball security (18.5–19.8).