
Fairfield
21-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
28.7%Fairfield
71.3%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL140.0
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -248

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFairfield 67
Projected Total140.0
Projected ScoreMerrimack 73
Team Comparison
50.1MMH Power Index53.7
109.6Offensive Efficiency106.4
105.4Defensive Efficiency103.2
4.2Net Efficiency3.2
-3.4Strength of Schedule0.7
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
67.8Tempo64.4
49.1%Effective FG%49.3%
15.0%Turnover Rate14.8%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
28.4%Free Throw Rate39.5%
2.8Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY71.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–50.1), defensive efficiency (103.2–105.4), strength of schedule (0.7–-3.4), recent form (12.9–3.3).
Fairfield COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.6–106.4), net efficiency (4.2–3.2), offensive rebounding (36.0–24.7).